illustration of Fortunato standing in motley behind a mostly completed brick wall with a skull superimposed on the wall where his face should be

The Cask of Amontillado

by Edgar Allan Poe
Start Free Trial

What are some examples of why you know the narrator is unreliable in the story "The Cask of Amontillado"?

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

As a first person narrator making what is probably a death bed confession fifty years after the fact, Montresor is telling the story in a way most likely to justify what he has done. We have nobody else's version of the tale with which to compare what Montresor tells us....

See
This Answer Now

Start your 48-hour free trial to unlock this answer and thousands more. Enjoy eNotes ad-free and cancel anytime.

Get 48 Hours Free Access

As a first person narrator making what is probably a death bed confession fifty years after the fact, Montresor is telling the story in a way most likely to justify what he has done. We have nobody else's version of the tale with which to compare what Montresor tells us. Therefore, we have to take his word about what happened. This is the word of someone capable of murdering a rival in heinous way by walling him up in a catacomb and leaving him to die, so one has every reason to suspect that this narrator is mentally unstable.

Further, Montresor never specifies what were the "thousand injuries" he claims Fortunato perpetrated against him. That there were so many leads one to believe they must have been small. But if that is true, we wonder why Montresor reacted in such an extreme way.

All of this uncertainty, along with the barbaric nature of the crime, undermines Montresor's reliability as a narrator.

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

Montresor never mentions even one of the "thousand injuries" that Fortunato has supposedly inflicted upon him: 

The thousand injuries of Fortunato I had borne as I best could, but when he ventured upon insult I vowed revenge. 

Montresor also does not detail what the "insult" was. The reader could simply take Montresor's word for it, but that is an assumption. A narrator establishes himself as a reliable source by providing explanations and reasons for his statements. Montresor never does this with the injuries and insults. 

Montresor also brags about his ability to hide the truth: 

It must be understood that neither by word nor deed had I given Fortunato cause to doubt my good will. 

Montresor proves how he can lie to and manipulate Fortunato. Since he is directly addressing the reader, who's to say he is not being a manipulative narrator as well? 

Some have suggested that Montresor's French name implies that he is new to Italy and therefore, he would have no Italian coat of arms. When Fortunato says he doesn't remember Montresor's coat of arms, this might be a minor insult because Montresor would not have a coat of arms. And note the motto: "Nemo me impune lacessit." This basically means "no one can harm me unpunished." It seems possible that Montresor could have made this up to underscore his feelings of vengeance. We can only guess what else he may have made up. 

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team