V. S. Naipaul portrays Mohun Biswas as a man who perennially strives for self-improvement. The irony of his situation is that the decisive vehicle for bettering his situation is his marriage to Shama Tulsi, whose family is of a much higher social status than his own. This decision empowers him...
See
This Answer NowStart your 48-hour free trial to unlock this answer and thousands more. Enjoy eNotes ad-free and cancel anytime.
Already a member? Log in here.
V. S. Naipaul portrays Mohun Biswas as a man who perennially strives for self-improvement. The irony of his situation is that the decisive vehicle for bettering his situation is his marriage to Shama Tulsi, whose family is of a much higher social status than his own. This decision empowers him by placing additional resources at his disposal but at the same time degrades him by creating a dependency on the powerful Tulsi clan, epitomized by his wife’s mother.
Mr. Biswas is determined to make a career for himself. His earlier efforts at making a living showed his persistence but were ultimately unsatisfactory, either to him or his supervisors. As he is both literate and a perceptive observer, he combines these qualities in the career of journalist. Although he finally must abandon his writing position, he has found a powerful voice.
Naipaul makes the physical house for which Mr. Biswas strives a central symbol of his broader efforts to achieve self-sufficiency and self-empowerment. At times his obsession even takes him away from the family loves, as he struggles to break away from the Tulsis. Although he never fully succeeds in overcoming the social and economic disadvantages into which he was born, he keeps his eyes on the elusive prize of homeownership.
Further Reading