Using the movie Grass is Greener plus one other scholarly article, focus on the racial politics that shaped cannabis prohibition, its cultural and social significance, its increasing normalization in society, and the factors that have led to its legalization in some countries. Using this information, make an argument for or against the Canadian Cannabis Act (2018).

An argument for the Cannabis Act could point to how Grass is Greener shows the racist effects of the criminalization of cannabis. It might also point to the potential economic benefits of the act for small businesses. An argument against the act might point to the dangers of young people accessing cannabis or the complicated implications of the act for the prison system.

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

An argument for the 2018 Cannabis Act should take into account the benefits of legalized cannabis production and consumption. For example, consider how the film Grass is Greener shows the disparities between how white communities profit from cannabis production and how people of color are incarcerated for having small amounts...

Unlock
This Answer Now

Start your 48-hour free trial to unlock this answer and thousands more. Enjoy eNotes ad-free and cancel anytime.

Start your 48-Hour Free Trial

An argument for the 2018 Cannabis Act should take into account the benefits of legalized cannabis production and consumption. For example, consider how the film Grass is Greener shows the disparities between how white communities profit from cannabis production and how people of color are incarcerated for having small amounts of cannabis in their possession. One could point to such disparities to argue that the criminalization of cannabis perpetuates racial inequality and that the act is thus a step forward in dismantling systemic racism. One could also point to the positive economic effects that the legalized sale of cannabis will likely have for small businesses throughout the country.

An argument against the Cannabis Act may point to the dangers of normalizing cannabis consumption in the face of young people. Consider how the act itself criminalizes giving cannabis to young people or even intentionally promoting cannabis products toward youth. These limitations seem difficult to control, and one could point to them to argue that the risks associated with young people accessing cannabis outweigh the potential benefits of the act. Another reason one might argue against the act is the impact it would have on the prison system and how complicated it would be to restructure with so many people already incarcerated for cannabis charges.

Last Updated by eNotes Editorial on