Use at least one of the 4 criteria for evaluating ideas (conceptual clarity, experiential confirmation, rational coherence, and implications for ethics/ daily living) to evaluate this fictional theory:Suppose you learned about a new theory called “Dyadism.” According to this theory, all Americans have had their brains hijacked by a group of aliens from outer space known as the Gamers. Furthermore, an essential idea in this theory is that Americans are “dyads”—that is, they are beings that retain their individual unique appearances, but their brain states are identical to one another in that they are all being controlled by the Gamers.

To evaluate this theory using conceptual clarity, question any parts that are unclear. To use experimental confirmation, consider if the theory conflicts with any universal human experiences. To apply rational coherence, make sure the theory doesn’t contradict itself. If you evaluate the implications for ethics, consider how this theory would change the ethical framework of society. For example, the Gamers might have a different conception of right and wrong which would then change how Americans define right and wrong.

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

This is an interesting theory, one that each of the evaluation criteria could be applied to. If you wanted to apply conceptualclarity , you should reflect on whether or not the idea is clear and why. This would involve asking specific questions for any parts of the theory that...

View
This Answer Now

Start your 48-hour free trial to unlock this answer and thousands more. Enjoy eNotes ad-free and cancel anytime.

Start your 48-Hour Free Trial

This is an interesting theory, one that each of the evaluation criteria could be applied to. If you wanted to apply conceptual clarity, you should reflect on whether or not the idea is clear and why. This would involve asking specific questions for any parts of the theory that comes across as unclear. If you wanted to apply experimental confirmation, consider if this theory opposes any facts that are proven by human life experience. This is different than proving a scientific fact through experimentation. Instead, you should consider if there are any parts of an almost universal human experience that complicate or contradict this theory. If you wanted to apply rational coherence, make sure that the theory does not contradict itself.

Let’s say you decided to focus on evaluating the implications of this theory for ethics and daily living. First, consider the various ways the world would change if Americans had their brains hijacked. Then, narrow down your thinking and consider how this would change ethics in American society. For instance, “the Gamers” would now be in control of Americans’ thoughts, which would mean that the conception of morality in the Gamers’ society would now be the approach to morality in American society. This may change the way Americans view right and wrong, which would change what is considered a morally acceptable action and what is not.

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team