In Hamlet, how does the theme of revenge relate to Laertes and Hamlet?
It is important to recognise the way in which Laertes and Hamlet are constantly compared and contrasted throughout the play. Both want to go back and study, though only Laertes is allowed. Both have fathers who are unjustly killed, and both want to revenge themselves against the perpetrators. The difference is that Laertes is yet another character who, compared against Hamlet 's endless procrastination,...
(The entire section contains 201 words.)
check Approved by eNotes Editorial
I am going to disagree somewhat with the above post. While both have a father killed and have cause to seek revenge, Laertes is no more moved to act than Hamlet is. They both profess their desire for revenge on wings as swift as meditation, but meditation is as far as it gets. Laertes is bent on killing Claudius and taking the throne as he bursts on the scene in 4.5. Of course Laertes does nothing. Later, Laertes confesses the desire to cut Hamlet's throat in the church yard. He actually gets his fingers on Hamlet's throat in 5.1 and again does nothing. They both have their reasons and excuses for not acting and thus highlight the gulf between being resolved to act and actually acting on the resolution. This is the main point of Hamlet's "to be" speech. Revenge is merely the vehicle to carry the heavier dichotomous themes of human weakness. All those with dead fathers in the play feel the blood lust for revenge. Be it Hamlet and Laertes or Prince Fortinbras and Pyrrhus. All delay their revenge. Prince Fortinbras goes so far as to forgo his revenge and his success at the end of the play is his reward.