Twelve Angry Men

In the play Twelve Angry Men, it is arguable to say that justice is served in the end, despite of the opinions, perspectives, points of view, and schema of the twelve men who were responsible for...

The author does not refer to the characters using their names because jurors are generally nameless in court. The judge calls jurors by their numbers, just as the author does here. The anonymity is...

In Twelve Angry Men, a drama about a jury deliberating over a murder case, the initial vote taken is eleven "guilty" and one "not guilty." The rising action progresses as more and more jurors are...

After being sequestered in the jurors' room, twelve jurymen are initially asked to vote upon a verdict on the Hispanic boy who has indicted for the murder of his father. The guard having locked...

The defendant claimed to have been watching a movie alone on the night of the murder. Straight away, this raises a red flag. If there was no one else there at the all-night movie theater, then no...

The last thing the jurors hear before entering the room to decide the case is one of the guards saying, "He doesn't stand a chance!" in reference to the young man on trial for murder. In other...

At the start of act 3 of Twelve Angry Men, the jurors decide to take another vote. This time, the vote is evenly split, six and six. This comes shortly after a fight nearly occurred between Juror...

At the end of Act I, Juror Nine changes his vote to not guilty. There is a secret ballot at the end of Act I, and the person who reversed his vote is not revealed until Act II. When the other...

The play Twelve Angry Men points out many flaws in the jury system. At the beginning, as the jurors first move into the jury room and are engaging in casual conversation, one refers to a previous...

By act 3 of Twelve Angry Men, tensions have risen in the tiny jury room. Despite several votes, the 12 men cannot agree on the guilt of the defendant. Reginald Rose constantly has characters refer...

Juror #10 establishes his racial prejudice quite early on in the play. His first few lines don't indicate anything, but then he says the following line: Well, look, you've gotta expect that. You...

The foreman is a practical man who wants to keep things moving and keep order. Early on, when tempers start to flare because of Juror 10's bigoted remarks, someone says they should stick to the...

When playwright Reginald Rose adapted his own experience serving on a jury in manslaughter case into the script for “Twelve Angry Men,” the most likely composition of a jury in such a case in that...

If anything, Twelve Angry Men is more about the power of an individual to turn the tide. Even without Juror 8, however, it would be unfair to say the rest of the jury is misusing their power. With...

One of the reasons Rose chose to cast his 1954 television play with twelve men (instead of a mix of women and men, which he later did do later on) is that, according to the prefatory material in...

I think one of the most important ways in which the author of this excellent play cleverly restores the audience's faith in the jury system is by deliberately starting off the play with reference...

Rose's having served upon a jury in a case similar to the one he portrays in Twelve Angry Men certainly lends verisimilitude to his drama, and, therefore, effects a relevancy to the characters'...

The play Twelve Angry Men, written by Reginald Rose, takes place entirely in a jury deliberation room as the dozen characters referred to in the title debate whether or not the unseen defendant is...

Twelve Angry Men deals with the racial and cultural prejudice of the United States of the 1950s. During the trial of a young man of color who's been accused of killing his own father, twelve white...

In Twelve Angry Men, one of the most important testimonies in the trial comes from a neighbor of the defendant, an old man who lives downstairs from him. There are two basic elements to the old...

The jurors almost unanimously vote guilty at the start of the play. While many of the jurors do simply believe the defendant is guilty of murder, other factors, such as the sweltering heat of the...

In Twelve Angry Men, twelve jurors deliberate a murder case, seeking to come to a unanimous decision about whether the boy on trial is guilty of killing his father. Juror 8 begins by saying he...

This question is very much an opinion based question. It is up to you to decide how this play might be changed for modern day audiences. Some of the changes could be huge, while other changes could...

Playwright Reginald Rose was inspired to write the play Twelve Angry Men after his own experiences serving on a jury left him fascinated by the procedures and dynamics involved when twelve...

It is questionable whether Reginald Rose's 1954 play, Twelve Angry Men, suggests that prejudices are a factor in every conflict. It does, though, certainly argue that racism can be a factor in...

The interviews conducted with jurors and the editor's own notes will be the information from which the news article is written. Remembering that newspaper articles are composed in the pyramid...

In Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose, the outcome for the boy probably would have been extremely different if the Fourteenth Amendment had not been ratified and the jury didn't apply the "due...

Reasonable doubt is the most significant legal issue discussed in Twelve Angry Men. A shallow perusal of the evidence presented would suggest the boy is guilty; however, as Juror Eight observes,...

In Act II of Twelve Angry Men the men are still deliberating the fate of the boy accused of stabbing his father to death. At this point, Three is the angriest and most problematic of all jurors. He...

In Twelve Angry Men, the juror who wishes to hurry the vote is Juror No. 7. A loud and superficial man, Juror No. 7 is a sarcastic salesman who is quick to form opinions. He is essentially a bully...

The story Twelve Angry Men shows a behind-the-scenes look at the deliberation between jurors as they essentially decide on the life of a young boy of Puerto Rican decent. The irony is that all of...

Twelve Angry Men is a film, written by Reginald Rose, that demonstrates the effect of prejudice on a jury deliberating on a murder case. The three leading examples of such prejudice come from...

In Twelve Angry Men, each of the jurors comes from a different social context, and each is affected differently. The jurors whose social contexts really stand out in their views of the defendant...

Juror Number Eight, although we are told little of his background, is clearly a level-headed, rational character who has the ability to empathize with the situation of the defendant and also who...

Juror number six is reserved and soft spoken. Throughout the deliberations, he only speaks a few times. Based on his profession as a house painter, his job description involved doing more physical...

In Reginald Rose’s Twelve Angry Men we see a jury struggle to come up with a verdict in a capital murder trial. The jury is composed of a group of diverse (although not diverse in a racial or...

In the quote above, the 3rd juror is biased in his judgment because of his personal experience with his son. So, we can say that his prejudice effectively clouds his ability to render true justice...

To arrive at a just verdict about the defendant’s guilt or innocence, the jurors are instructed to review the evidence and reach a determination about the case. However, most, if not all, of the...

At the beginning of Act III of Twelve Angry Men, the men take an open vote. The split is even, with six voting guilty and six voting for acquittal. The first juror to vote for not guilty, Juror 8,...

The setting of Twelve Angry Men is consistent throughout the play; therefore, the setting of Act 1 is the same as the settings for Acts 2 and 3. The entire play takes place in the deliberation...

The movie Twelve Angry Men is based on the play by the same title by Reginald Rose. The movie exposes several flaws in the US justice system, including the potential bias of the jurors, the risk of...

I am going to assume that a "theme statement" is the same as a thesis statement, a statement that you can explain and support with evidence from a piece of literature. For your assignment over...

It's difficult to gauge the precise intentions of any artist, but in the case of Reginald Rose in Twelve Angry Men we can make a reasonable surmise. One possible intention could be to lift the lid...

With regards to Rose's drama, the statement has much in way of validity. Certainly, the discussion that takes place in the jury room is a testament to the idea that it is important to view reality...

Over the course of the play, Juror #8 emerges as the leader of the group. Juror #8 is the first person (and initially the only person) to express doubt that the boy accused of murdering his father...

It's usual for a jury to vote before deliberating because they want to know where they stand before discussing the case. It might be that all twelve of them agree on the verdict, and then it...