The Interlopers Questions and Answers
by Saki

The Interlopers book cover
Start Your Free Trial

What are three possible interpretations of "The Interlopers"?

Expert Answers info

accessteacher eNotes educator | Certified Educator

calendarEducator since 2009

write13,728 answers

starTop subjects are Literature, Social Sciences, and History

It is interesting that the tree falling down is described as "nature's act of violence." This would support the views given above in #4 and #5. The men are the interlopers into a treacherous environment, and pay the consequences as a result.

check Approved by eNotes Editorial

ask996 eNotes educator | Certified Educator

calendarEducator since 2009

write2,181 answers

starTop subjects are Literature, Social Sciences, and Science

I agree with mwestwood. The men are the true interlopers. They have brought their blood feud into the wild beauty of nature, and while nature would expect the beast to be cruel, humankind is not meant to act like animals. As retribution, nature ensured that each man got his wish for "the other's death."

check Approved by eNotes Editorial

mwestwood eNotes educator | Certified Educator

calendarEducator since 2006

write16,150 answers

starTop subjects are Literature, History, and Social Sciences

Since you have put Interlopers as the title, the question seems to imply interpretation of the story per se. One interpretation can be that the men, both Georg Znaeym and Ulrich von Gradwitz are interlopers, or trespassers into the pristine state of the forest.  Nature shows its disapproval of this violation with two punishments:  the fallen branches and the wolves.

check Approved by eNotes Editorial

Lori Steinbach eNotes educator | Certified Educator

calendarEducator since 2010

write4,539 answers

starTop subjects are Literature, Social Sciences, and History

The word interlopers is what probably has three meanings.  The word itself means intruders, so let's look at three kinds of interlopers in this short story.  First, one of the men was an interloperon the land--it belonged to one of them, and so at least one of them was trespassing.  Second, How about the idea that the men were not where they should have been on that stormy night.  It says even the night animals were running for shelter in the storm; none of them were out in it.  Finally, of course, the wolves are interlopers in this new pact of friendship.  They just don't belong.

check Approved by eNotes Editorial

clane eNotes educator | Certified Educator

calendarEducator since 2006

write658 answers

starTop subjects are Literature, Science, and Law and Politics

The Interlopers is not one of those stories that is up for many different interpretations. While it does have a surprise ending, the "rescuers" are actually wolves, the ending is not really ambiguous. I suppose one might be able to predict what happened to Georg and Ulrich, perhaps one of their parties arrived just in the nick of time. Maybe the wolves nudged one of the men free and they got a chance to become friends. Maybe the story was written as an allegory for how World War I started (see the link below).

check Approved by eNotes Editorial



nikilee8 | Student

Saki wrote this when at war. In the world war about 35 million people were killed or badly wounded. I think Saki thought that the idea of man fighting over land to a muderous point was stupid.