Three great unifiersWhat were the methds by which the Three great unifiers established Japanese unity. Did they have similar goals? Was Tokugawa most successful just because he was the last?

5 Answers | Add Yours

litteacher8's profile pic

litteacher8 | High School Teacher | (Level 3) Distinguished Educator

Posted on

You can look at the three great unifiers in Japan in this way. One method of unifying a country is to build pride in your nationality. You can unify and consolidate power, but in order to keep it you have to maintain a sense of national pride and unity in order to get people to accept your control.
kplhardison's profile pic

Karen P.L. Hardison | College Teacher | eNotes Employee

Posted on

One method Tokugawa Ieyasu used to unify Japan and consolidate his power after redistributing conquered lands among the daimyo was to require each daimyo to spend every other year in Edo (now Tokyo). The expense was enormous and the intermittent time away from home worked together to prevent any daimyo from consolidating power of his own.

http://www.japan-guide.com/e/e2128.html

rrteacher's profile pic

rrteacher | College Teacher | (Level 2) Educator Emeritus

Posted on

The saying in Japan is that "Oda Nobunaga pounded the rice cake, Toyotomi baked it, and Tokugawa ate it." Clearly Tokugawa was successful in establishing a long-enduring and expansive shogunate, but his achievements would likely have been impossible without those of his predecessors. At the same time, though, Tokugawa faced plenty of obstacles, and made a number of important decisions, in particular the decision to legally proscribe Christianity, which had been accepted to an extent by his predecessors. The character of Japanese society was markedly different as a result of these and other decisions.

accessteacher's profile pic

accessteacher | High School Teacher | (Level 3) Distinguished Educator

Posted on

I think the goal of the three unifiers was similar in that they all wanted to establish power over as much territory as they could. It was about gaining control of the contempoary system of power so that they could in turn gain control over the populace. It is always the case that the last individual has the advantage because he or she is able to build upon what has gone before.

pohnpei397's profile pic

pohnpei397 | College Teacher | (Level 3) Distinguished Educator

Posted on

Yes, I'd say that Tokugawa was most successful because he was last and was able to build on the successes of Oda and Toyotomi.  The three of them were all trying to unite Japan through controlling the imperial court (to give them legitimacy) and then extending their control (either militarily or by negotiation) over as many daimyo as they could.

We’ve answered 318,983 questions. We can answer yours, too.

Ask a question