Abstract illustration of two hats under a leafless tree in black and white

Waiting for Godot

by Samuel Beckett

Start Free Trial

Is there much difference between existentialist philosophy (as in the ideas of Albert Camus, for example) and the Theatre of the Absurd? If so, what are the core differences between them?

Quick answer:

For the sake of brevity, it is best to say that existentialist philosophy explores questions of meaning and existence, while Theatre of the Absurd is a genre of drama. While some writers may see themselves as exponents of Existentialism or Theatre of the Absurd, they are two different things. Existentialism: Some Key Figures Albert Camus (1913-1960) – French Algerian writer and philosopher. His most famous work is The Stranger (1942), which tells the tale of an alienated man who becomes involved in a murder and eventually executed for it

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

Theatre of the Absurd refers to plays written largely in Europe in the late 1950s and influenced by Existentialism. Thus, existentialist philosophy is more of a broad umbrella term for a school of thought exploring questions of individuality and existence, while Theatre of the Absurd is a specific genre of...

This Answer Now

Start your 48-hour free trial to unlock this answer and thousands more. Enjoy eNotes ad-free and cancel anytime.

Get 48 Hours Free Access

drama. Existentialist philosophy is difficult to define, with Existentialist thinkers rarely coming to an agreement on its tenets. In general, though, Existentialism proceeds on the key concepts that existence precedes essence (a focus on authentic existence) and that absurdity or meaninglessness is part of existence.

The term “Theatre of the Absurd” was coined by critic Martin Esslin in 1960, using the term “Absurd” in the way Albert Camus used it in “The Myth of Sisyphus,” a 1942 essay. The “Absurd” refers to man’s struggle for meaning in a meaningless world. Probably the most famous play in this genre is Samuel Beckett’s 1952 Waiting for Godot. The focus of this play is man’s inability to overcome the absurdity of life and that everything is ultimately pointless.

Another distinction between existentialist philosophy and Theatre of the Absurd is that a fictional work may deal with existential concepts without the author necessarily seeing himself or herself as a proponent of the philosophy.

Approved by eNotes Editorial
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

Existentialism, as a philosophy, allows for free-range thinking under the prospect that life may or may not have any purpose for living. This philosophy questions whether the constructs that we have built are worth following, and whether the ideas and philosophies that we follow are a realistic need to survive.

The theater of the absurd takes these notions to an extreme because of the need to illustrate "the point". Theater, as an art form, also tends to combine other elements such as realism and fantasy to fulfill the duties of entertaining an paying audience. This is an unfortunate reality, but it is reality nevertheless.

Therefore, existentialism will always allow for a number of diverse sub-constructs to surface as part of its philosophical tendency. The theater of the absurd is meant to show a few tenets of existentialism for the purpose of illustrating the point.

Approved by eNotes Editorial
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

There are certainly differences. The most important difference would seem to be that Absurdist Theatre is a formally defined concept and existentialism is a rather wide-ranging body of thought commonly defined as a philosophy. 

Absurdist Theatre can explore and express existentialist ideas, but existentialism certainly cannot be defined as a formal, abstract mode of theatrical presentation, theatrical writing, and self-referential drama. 

(Existentialism is not necessarily characterized by self-reference as Absurdist Theatre often is.)

Approved by eNotes Editorial