There are four of us doing a class presentation/seminar on subtext; we have a lot of ideas on how to show subtext.... but we are struggling to devise a question that we can argue!
Any help would be much appreciated.
1 Answer | Add Yours
The main "controversy" involving subtext is "intentionality." Does the artist intentionally insert subtext, and is he/she "intending" to have the work received as a "puzzle" or "riddle" to be deciphered, etc.; or is subtext a product of the reader's/viewer's imagination, depending on his/her past experiences and interpretive skills, etc.? The "old" criticism sought to unravel the artist's secret "meaning," while New Criticism deals with the effect of structure/form that the artist uses. A good way to address this controversy is to offer up two distinct works of art -- say a Wordsworth poem and an E. E. Cummings poem, or a Mozart piece and a Philip Glass piece, or a Rembrandt and a Warhol -- and ask the debaters/participants how each approach engages or disengages the works' subtext. A good question, then, might be "Which approach best informs the work's subtext and what are the shortcomings of that approach?" Hope this helps.
We’ve answered 318,929 questions. We can answer yours, too.Ask a question