Summary of "Why the World isn't Flat" by Panjak Ghemawat.I know its a sort of reply to Thomas Friedman's "The World is Flat" talking aboutthe world not being as globalized as we were meant to...

Summary of "Why the World isn't Flat" by Panjak Ghemawat.

I know its a sort of reply to Thomas Friedman's "The World is Flat" talking aboutthe world not being as globalized as we were meant to believe.

Expert Answers
rogal eNotes educator| Certified Educator

In this article, Pankaj Ghemawat attempts to counter assertions made by Thomas Friedman in his book The World is Flat to the effect that globalization has helped to create a “flat,” highly connected world. His arguments are based on the following points:

  • A large percentage (90% or more) of fixed investments all over the world are domestic. In a more connected or flat world, this figure would be lower, pointing to the internationalization of business activities. Accompanying data for the period 2003-2005 shows that aggregate levels of internationalization across various industries for a range of activities does not exceed 10%, with the exception of activities such as patents, portfolio investments, and trade—and these do not exceed 25% or thereabouts, thus, the “10 Percent Presumption.” It could then be said that the world is actually semi-globalized, with ongoing assumptions relating to a highly globalized world being mere exaggerations.
  • In spite of great achievements in connectivity across borders, brought about by inventions such as the internet, there still exist geographical boundaries that greatly limit people’s movements and actions. In other words, "we’re more wired, but not more 'global.'"
  • The clash between “national sovereignty” and international economic integration greatly limits cross-border connectivity. For example, there is overwhelming evidence that individual countries tend to favor protectionist policies over free trade.
pohnpei397 eNotes educator| Certified Educator

Basically, the author makes a couple of main points.  First, he says that there really is not nearly so much globalization as people think.  For example, he points out, about 90% of all investment is done within countries, not by people from one country investing in another country.  He also points out that even big companies like Google are often much stronger in one nation and much weaker in others.

Second, he says that what globalization there is is fragile and could go away.  He points out that other supposed trends (like the idea that liberal democracies were taking over and all countries would move in that direction) have not panned out.  He says there is no guarantee that globalization will increase.