The essay is written in two tenses: past and present. What effect does this have on its telling?  "Shooting an Elephant" by George Orwell

Expert Answers

Want to remove ads?

Get ad-free questions with an eNotes 48-hour free trial.

Try It Free No Thanks
mwestwood eNotes educator| Certified Educator

George Orwell's essay, "Shooting an Elephant" is an addendum to his work, Burmese Days, a novel on the colonialism of Great Britain.  As such, it is concerned with the incident in which Orwell felt obligated to shoot a rogue elephant, while at the same time there are reflections on the dilemmas of existing colonialism that continue to surround him.  For instance, in the second paragraph, Orwell writes that he was in favor of " the wretched Burmese," but he could get nothing into perspective:

I did not even know that the British Empire is dying, still less did I know that it is a great deal better than the younger empires that are going to supplant it.

This comment in the present tense illustrates Orwell's connecting of his act of shooting the elephant with problems that currently exist for England, thus making his essay a political piece.  Later in this same paragraph, Orwell also comments about his thoughts of killing a Buddhist monk as a consequence of becoming a colonialist,

Feelings like these are the normal byproducts of imperialism; ask any Anglo-Indian official, if you can catch him off duty.

Further, in the next paragraph, Orwell again comments in present tense upon the nature of despotic imperialism in critical words.  These reflections in the present tense contribute to the tone of the author, George Orwell, and underscore the final statement of Orwell that he had shot the elephant "solely to avoid looking a fool."  He was and is aware of the tremendous effect that colonialism has had upon him.


Read the study guide:
Shooting an Elephant

Access hundreds of thousands of answers with a free trial.

Start Free Trial
Ask a Question