show, using algebra, that the formula for a parabola is a special case of the formula for an ellipse
The parametric form of an ellipse (centred on the origin) is given by
`x = a sin t`, `y = b cos t` where `t in [0,2pi]` and `a` and `b` are constants.
The parametric form of a parabola (centred on the origin also) is given by
`x = c u^2`, `y = 2cu` where `u in [-infty,+infty]` and `c` and `d` are constants.
Equating the `x` variables and `y` variables we get
1) ` cu^2 = asint`
2) `2cu = b cos t`
Dividing 1) by 2) gives `u = ((2a)/b) tan t`
because `(sint)/(cost) = tan t`
The range of `t` is now restricted to `t in [-pi/2, pi/2]` because the tangent is undefined outside this range. This gives `u in [-infty,+infty]` (and the values of `a` and `b` are irrelevant as they simply determine the "speed" with which we get to the ends of the parabola - which we never do!). Since the range of `t` is restricted to half it's usual range (for a full ellipse), this is why the parabola looks like half of an ellipse.
Written in parametric form, an ellipse and parabola are equivalent when we write
u = tan(t) where t is the parameter of the ellipse and u the parameter of the parabola. The range of t is `[-pi/2,pi/2]` and the range of u is `[-infty,+infty]`