Should status offenders be treated differently than juveniles?

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

This is an interesting question, for the difference between a juvenile delinquent and a status offender is clearly defined by law; however, psychologically, they are as similar as they are different.  In the article I've attached below from the Psychiatric Quarterly, it's clear that the actual difference between these two classes of young people is minimal.  Their behaviors are similar, though the causes may be different.  A juvenile delinquent breaks the law and becomes a menace (or at least a nuisance) to himself and society; a status offender is a juvenile who commits acts which would not be considered crimes if adults had committed them, such as truancy.  Should one who commits a non-crime be treated the same as one who commits an actual crime?  While status offenders must be dealt with (and might even benefit from the same resources available to juvenile offenders), if they don't commit a crime they should not be punished as if they did.

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team

We’ll help your grades soar

Start your 48-hour free trial and unlock all the summaries, Q&A, and analyses you need to get better grades now.

  • 30,000+ book summaries
  • 20% study tools discount
  • Ad-free content
  • PDF downloads
  • 300,000+ answers
  • 5-star customer support
Start your 48-Hour Free Trial