Should the government increase tax rates on everyone as a way to equalize incomes and wealth?

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

This is definitely a personal opinion question, so feel free to state your opinion and defend it. Personally, I do not think that the government should increase or decrease tax rates on everyone in order to equalize incomes and wealth. There is no motivation to work hard and earn a ton of money if the government is going to make it so that everybody's earnings are equivalent. Of course that statement is quite steeped in capitalism and the American Dream. As a general rule, I think the government should have as little control over an individual's money as possible. With that said, the government does need to collect taxes in order to fund the public services that it does provide. I like smooth, clean roads. I like law enforcement having enough officers to keep the peace. That all comes from tax dollars, and it is a very tough decision to figure out exactly how much a population can or should be taxed. It makes sense to tax the wealthy at a higher rate than the poor. The wealthy have more to give; however, I have also seen strong arguments for having a flat tax rate. Everybody gives 10% of their income. That's in line with what churches ask for regarding annual tithing. Finally, the question seems to assume that taxation through income is the only way to tax a population. Sales taxes and property taxes are other ways that a government could increase their tax incomes.

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

As the question is about the use of taxation as a means to bring more equality in income and wealth it would not be possible to do that by a uniform increase in the tax rates for everyone. The present slabs for the percent of income that has to be paid as tax makes use of an increasing rate of income tax. People with an income in the lowest slab pay only 10% of their income as tax while those with an income lying in the uppermost slab pay 35% of their income as tax.

If the government's intention is to transfer wealth from those that earn the most to those that live in poverty, the tax rates for the lower income slabs should be decreased and that for higher income slabs increased. There can also be a change made in the income slabs themselves so that a lower rate applies for a higher income level.

Taxation though is not merely a means of wealth transfer, it provides the government with the resources to function and help the society progress and the economy grow. This makes the taxation policy that is adopted very complex in nature.

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

This is as much a political question as it is an economic one.  It depends on what you think the ideal society would look like.

The major issue is whether we should want to make incomes more equal or we should want to increase the incomes of those with less money, even if the rich continue to get richer.  If all we want is more equality, then we can certainly raise taxes (though we should be sure to raise taxes more on the rich than on the middle class and poor) to take more money away from the rich people.  However, it is not clear that this is wise and/or sustainable, especially in a globalized world where money might then flow out of our country to places with lower taxes.  Instead, it seems to me that we ought to be trying to make sure that incomes of the poor and middle class rise in absolute terms.  Raising taxes is not the best way to do this.

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team
Soaring plane image

We’ll help your grades soar

Start your 48-hour free trial and unlock all the summaries, Q&A, and analyses you need to get better grades now.

  • 30,000+ book summaries
  • 20% study tools discount
  • Ad-free content
  • PDF downloads
  • 300,000+ answers
  • 5-star customer support
Start your 48-Hour Free Trial