Is the ruling in the case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission more consistent with judicial restraint or judicial activism? Explain. More information is in a January 22, 2010 article from the New York Times.

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

It is interesting to read the opinions offered by the Court.  I think that the case is an example of activism because it represents the court using its power to right a perceived wrong present in the law passed by Congress.  Justice Roberts actually argued that the decision of the court helps to keep principles of judicial restraint in tact.  I am in no way qualified to out think a Supreme Court Justice, so I would advise you to read over the decisions offered by the Court...

(The entire section contains 2 answers and 253 words.)

Unlock This Answer Now

Start your 48-hour free trial to unlock this answer and thousands more. Enjoy eNotes ad-free and cancel anytime.

Start your 48-Hour Free Trial
Approved by eNotes Editorial Team