Obviously, this document is not from the Hakluyts, and while you haven't told us exactly where it is from, I assume it must be from Winthrop's 1629 justification for the settlement. Basically, Winthrop argued that God had intended for man to be fruitful and multiply, and to "improve" the land and natural resources he was provided with. Winthrop argued, as did most Europeans, that the Indians were not doing this. He thought (or said, anyway) that they were not making full use of the land. Of course, this view was steeped in an ethnocentric understanding of what farms were supposed to look like, as well as of appropriate forms of land use, but it was very common--perhaps the most common justification for expropriating Indian lands through the late nineteenth century. A variant of this view would later be expressed in economic terms by John Locke as the "labor theory of value." Winthrop also argued that the Puritans would bring Christianity to the Indians, but that was not as germane to this question as the issue of proper land use.
Popular QuestionsBrowse All
Latest answer posted May 02, 2022 at 4:40:57 AM
Evaluate the extent of change in the domestic United States during the Second World War from 1939 to 1945.
Latest answer posted October 06, 2019 at 11:40:56 AM
Latest answer posted December 20, 2016 at 1:47:16 PM
Discuss the factors that led to the rise of medieval universities, their organisation and the Muslim contribution to their development.
Latest answer posted August 03, 2011 at 2:13:13 AM
How does the saying "ang hindi lumingon sa pinanggalingan ay hindi makakarating sa paroroonan" relate to history?
Latest answer posted January 15, 2021 at 11:09:50 AM