2 Answers | Add Yours
Benigni's film depicts a father who feels confident that he is in control of the world around him. The father understands completely that he needs to be strong for his son and thus develops the "game approach" to the death camp. Essentially, the father never wavers in his commitment to his son and his ability to be the shelter in the storm for his child. This is vastly different than the reality that governs Eliezer's father. He recognizes, almost instantly in his struggle, that he is not in control. There is little he can do to maintain his control of the world for his son. Interestingly enough, in Benigni's work there is a strict interpretation of how father and son interact with one another, whereas the latter follows the lead of the former. In Wiesel's work, this is inverted. The son becomes more of the "father" than the father. The ending of the work is the most telling of this as Eliezer has to tend to his father, wishing his father would be quiet as he is being beaten and remaining silent while his father's last words are to call out to a son. In this, there is a different understanding of the relationship between father and son in the film as opposed to Wiesel's work.
hgoidwodbogidndikndloinfdgbnfhnjfeehflonsdnj njgvfenb f e bjeh gf bgefg ekbh gbkg er h
We’ve answered 319,189 questions. We can answer yours, too.Ask a question