Was the speaker in "My Last Duchess" an objective or omniscient narrator?
In the poem "My Last Duchess" by Robert Browning, the narrator is omniscent only in the fact that he knew what really went on with her murder, he knew how it happened, when and by whom, and he knows why he is telling his visitor the details that he is. So, he is "all-knowing" or omniscent in the sense that he has a motive for telling his tale to the representative of the new wife, and he knows the real story behind his first wife's death. So, of the two options you have provided above, I think that omniscent is the better choice--he isn't a very objective speaker; he has been emotionally involved in the tale, has a motive and underlying agenda, and so chooses and presents his facts depending on who is around. That describes someone as subjective. So, go with omniscent if those are your only two choices, but I still don't like it.
A better description for the narrator is to describe him as an unreliable narrator. Telling the story is a man who "gave commands" to have his wife murdered. How much can we really trust him? And, he obviously has some pretty glaring weaknesses; his wounded ego and pride led to the murder, and we never get the wife's perspective. All we get are his descriptions of how she was
"too soon made glad, /Too easily impressed: she liked whate'er /She looked on, and her looks went everywhere."
We never get to hear her point of view. Did she really disrespect his "nine-hundred-years-old name" as he claimed she did? Did she really flirst and blush at everything or was that his wounded ego imagining things? His perspective of things is incomplete, and biased, so he is not a reliable narrator, not one we can trust to present a fair and balanced view of the events.
I hope that those thoughts help to get you thinking a bit; good luck!
"My Last Duchess" is a narrative poem by Robert Browning that is structured as a dramatic monolog. The speaker is the cold and arrogant Duke Ferrara who escorts a visitor through his castle, pausing before a portrait of the Duke's previous wife who, we learn, has died. The poem's point of view, therefore, is that of a first-person narrator. The story is limited by what he chooses to disclose about what he knows of her.
The Duke is not an objective narrator. As he speaks of the Duchess, he reveals himself to have been cruel, dismissive, and domineering toward her. When he speaks of her, he reveals her personality, as well, but the qualities in the Duchess that he scorns are those of an open and loving person. The gentle Duchess would have been valued by anyone who lacked the Duke's arrogance and need to dominate.
Robert Browning's “My Last Duchess” is a classic example of a dramatic monologue. “My Last Duchess” may be familiar from any school literature course; and it wouldn't surprise me if you have met this poem before. Whether or not it is familiar, it makes a useful tool for poetic analysis. If you are asked to define your feelings toward the Duke, you could point to lines in the poem that helped define those feelings.
Browning stresses the Duke’s arrogance (“I choose / Never to stoop”; “I gave commands; / Then all smiles stopped together”) and engages our sympathies for the poor Duchess in lines 21–31, despite the Duke’s contempt for her facility to be gladdened. It's possible to ask yourself, “Shouldn’t we feel sorry for the Duke, with all his marital troubles?”
Another question: to what extent is the Duke’s attitude toward women presumably typical of his society? That the Count, the visitor’s master, would offer a daughter to a man who had just disposed of his wife, suggests that the Duke is not alone in regarding women as chattel.
Still, even for a Renaissance duke he seems cold-hearted: wives and works of art seem identified as objects to collect. What were the Duke’s commands that stopped the Duchess’s smiles? “That she should be put to death, or he might have had her shut up in a convent,” Browning once explained. But lines 2 (“Looking as if she were alive”) and 46–47 (“There she stands / As if alive”) seem to hint that she was executed.
Hypocrisy is still another aspect of the Duke’s character: compare his protest that he lacks skill in speech (lines 35–36) with his artful flattery of the Count (49–53).
Browning's poem is an exemplar for practicing your analytical skills.