1 Answer | Add Yours
I think that the premise of the Moliere drama as one where there is a critique offered of the social conventions of the day has a directly reflective effect regarding the absolutist ideas of Louis XIV. The memoirist Saint- Simon once wrote about Louis XIV that "There was nothing he liked so much as flattery, or, to put it more plainly, adulation; the coarser and clumsier it was, the more he relished it." Voltaire confirmed the same idea about the absolutist ruler:
It is certain that he passionately wanted glory, rather than the conquests themselves. In the acquisition of Alsace and half of Flanders, and of all of Franche-Comté, what he really liked was the name he made for himself.
Both recollections of the French Monarch reveal the social convention of the time period, a condition where inauthenticity defined how individuals interact with one another. Alceste is driven to be honest and define himself in a way that transcends the condition where "flattery" and false "adulation" guide the contours of human interaction.
Such a condition becomes a reflection of how Moliere might be challenging life under Louis XIV. The absolutist condition of the time period made social interactions based on inauthenticity a standard for all. It was never restrained because it was a top- down approach. Louis XIV showed a preference for it and throughout French society this preference was seen as absolute, something non- negotiable. Moliere's construction of how fraudulence cannot be a means through which individuals live their lives is a reflection of the structure and manner of society under Louis XIV. Alceste's repudiation of such a world and his desire to flee it can represent Moliere's fundamental challenge to the absolutist means and approach of the social world under Louis XIV.
We’ve answered 318,995 questions. We can answer yours, too.Ask a question