I think that the premise of the Moliere drama as one where there is a critique offered of the social conventions of the day has a directly reflective effect regarding the absolutist ideas of Louis XIV. The memoirist Saint- Simon once wrote about Louis XIV that "There was nothing he liked so much as flattery, or, to put it more plainly, adulation; the coarser and clumsier it was, the more he relished it." Voltaire confirmed the same idea about the absolutist ruler:
It is certain that he passionately wanted glory, rather than the conquests themselves. In the acquisition of Alsace and half of Flanders, and of all of Franche-Comté, what he really liked was the name he made for himself.
Both recollections of the French Monarch reveal the social convention of the time period, a condition where inauthenticity defined how individuals interact with one another. Alceste is driven to be honest and define himself in a way that transcends the condition where "flattery" and false "adulation" guide the contours of human interaction.
Such a condition becomes a reflection of how Moliere might be challenging life under Louis XIV. The absolutist condition of the time period made social interactions based on inauthenticity a standard for all. It was never restrained because it was a top- down approach. Louis XIV showed a preference for it and throughout French society this preference was seen as absolute, something non- negotiable. Moliere's construction of how fraudulence cannot be a means through which individuals live their lives is a reflection of the structure and manner of society under Louis XIV. Alceste's repudiation of such a world and his desire to flee it can represent Moliere's fundamental challenge to the absolutist means and approach of the social world under Louis XIV.