Korematsu v. United States

Start Free Trial

In Korematsu vs. United States, what were the arguments that Japanese internment camps were constitutional? 

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that the internment of the Americans of Japanese descent (or at least their removal from the West Coast) was legal.  It did so on the grounds of military necessity.

In his majority opinion, Justice Hugo Black relied on the power of the president as commander-in-chief of the military.  He argued that this power gives the president the ability to do whatever is reasonable in fighting a war.  He argued there was no time for the president and other authorities to determine which Japanese were and were not loyal to the United States.  Because it was an emergency, the president’s actions were reasonable and therefore constitutional.

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team
Soaring plane image

We’ll help your grades soar

Start your 48-hour free trial and unlock all the summaries, Q&A, and analyses you need to get better grades now.

  • 30,000+ book summaries
  • 20% study tools discount
  • Ad-free content
  • PDF downloads
  • 300,000+ answers
  • 5-star customer support
Start your 48-Hour Free Trial