When the Emperor Was Divine

by Julie Otsuka
Start Free Trial

In When the Emperor Was Divine, Otsuka often withholds information from the reader. She tells us that the woman writes down some words from the notice but doesn’t say what they are until later. She only gradually divulges the details of the father’s arrest. What is the effect of this silence? Could it be symbolic?

Otsuka's withholding of information and narrative silence could be symbolic of themes surrounding identity, assimilation, and roles within the family and society.

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

Something striking about Otsuka’s narration is that she never reveals the names of the main characters—she refers to them only as “the woman,” “the girl,” “the boy,” and “the father.” Typically, it’s important to the author to draw readers in and help them connect to the characters, but Otsuka intentionally...

See
This Answer Now

Start your 48-hour free trial to unlock this answer and thousands more. Enjoy eNotes ad-free and cancel anytime.

Get 48 Hours Free Access

Something striking about Otsuka’s narration is that she never reveals the names of the main characters—she refers to them only as “the woman,” “the girl,” “the boy,” and “the father.” Typically, it’s important to the author to draw readers in and help them connect to the characters, but Otsuka intentionally withholds the characters’ names; this creates distance between the reader and the story. Even though the reader gets to know the characters through their words and actions, there is still a sense of unfamiliarity present throughout the work. Because the minor characters in the story do have names, there is a sense of contrast and separation between the main characters and the rest of their world.

This all ties in with several themes in the book—most notably the themes of cultural assimilation and uncertain identity (or even the complete loss of identity). Otsuka refers to the protagonists in very generic terms that apply to many people, essentially reducing them to their most basic roles in society. It’s possible that Otsuka is providing commentary here on how assimilating can remove all of the little nuances that make a person stand out from the crowd. This is reflected in the actions of the characters as well, for example, when the woman destroys Japanese things that are important to her in order to prove that she is loyal to America. In the internment camp, the characters become even less unique. Overall, Otsuka seems to focus on the loss of identity that results from the fear of standing out.

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team