In Of Mice and Men, would you consider George to be innocent or guilty on Lennie's death?

Expert Answers info

lsumner eNotes educator | Certified Educator

calendarEducator since 2010

write1,184 answers

starTop subjects are Literature, Social Sciences, and History

Although George is guilty of pulling the trigger, he saved Lennie from dying a horrible hanging death at the hands of Curley. In one sense, George saved Lennie from an agonizing death. If George had not shot Lennie, he would have been at the mercy of Curley. Since Curley had no compassion, Lennie would have been hanged. Curley would have tortured Lennie. George is innocent because he saved Lennie from a horrible hanging death. George made sure Lennie felt no pain:

With great difficulty George fires the gun at the place where Carlson had told Candy to shoot the dog, the spot at which the creature would die feeling no pain.

When the reader considers that Curley would have tortured Lennie, it appears that George is innocent of taking Lennie's life. George saved Lennie's life from suffering at the hands of a cruel man. Because of George's compassion, Lennie is free from all worry and pain. 

If Curley had gotten to Lennie first, he would have caused Lennie to suffer unmercifully. Lennie did not deserve to die. He killed Curley's wife accidentally. Nonetheless, Curley would not have reasoned with Lennie. 

George did Lennie a favor by pulling the trigger. Lennie was already a dead man due to Curley's anger. George is not guilty of killing Lennie. George saved Lennie from hanging. George saved Lennie from Curley. Lennie dies hearing George tell about their dream. Lennie dies dreaming about his farm and farmhouse. Thanks to George, Lennie will suffer no more. 

George had no choice. He had to shoot Lennie. He is guilty of having compassion on a mentally ill man. Even Slim knows that George had no choice:

Slim, still at George’s side, says again that George only did what he had to do. 

check Approved by eNotes Editorial
D. Reynolds eNotes educator | Certified Educator

calendarEducator since 2016

write8,853 answers

starTop subjects are Literature, History, and Social Sciences

I would call what George did a mercy killing and consider him innocent of murder. What he did is referred to as applying situational ethics, in which a person decides what the most ethical path is based on circumstances, not moral absolutes. Using the same situational ethics, it is not unethical to lie to the Nazi Gestapo about hiding a Jew.

George acts as he does after Lennie accidentally kills Curley's wife, because he knows that Curley is planning a slow, cruel death for Lennie. Curley has been resentful of Lennie since he arrived at the ranch for being bigger and stronger and for besting him in a fight. Curley also considered his new young wife a trophy possession and will have to assert his manhood by making Lennie suffer for taking her away.

George knows that in Curley's hands, Lennie's death is likely to turning into a lynching, so he is lucky to get to him first.

It costs George greatly to kill Lennie, and he does it as an act of love. Once he puts the merciful bullet in Lennie's head, all of his own dreams die: there will be no hope of a farm, for instance, without a friend to share it with him. George will become just another wandering, lonely migrant worker. He does what he does because, in the circumstances, he considers it the only right thing to do.

check Approved by eNotes Editorial

emfitz3 | Student

I think George was guilty of lennies death, because he made lennie believe that he truly wanted the best for him, which is so mean to do to a mentally challenged person. Lennie didn't know any better, so he listens to George and savors every word of his.  But George shot him instead of trying to get him to a safe place, away from the people looking for him. I don't think a true friend would do that, so George is definitely guilty for the death of lennie.

check Approved by eNotes Editorial

Unlock This Answer Now