In 1984, Ampleforth and Parsons are arrested. What is suggested about personal security by this?

Ampleforth and Parsons's arrests in 1984 suggest that there is no personal security in the dystopian nation of Oceania. Although both characters significantly differ in intelligence, they are depicted as orthodox, obedient Party members. Their arrests are rather surprising and indicate that no one is safe from Big Brother and that anybody can be arrested.

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

In Orwell's celebrated novel 1984, Ampleforth and Parsons are depicted as significantly different characters who are both arrested by the Thought Police and imprisoned in the Ministry of Love. Ampleforth is portrayed as a highly intelligent poet who produces effective government propaganda and has a strong grasp on Newspeak and language in general. He is a particularly orthodox man with an important job but finds himself imprisoned in the Ministry of Love alongside Winston Smith. In contrast, Parsons is depicted as an unintelligent, orthodox man who is a leading figure on the Sports Committee and a devout Party member. Parsons is a mindless, enthusiastic supporter of Big Brother and goes out of his way to make preparations for Hate Week.

Inside the Ministry of Love, Winston Smith is astonished to see both Ampleforth and Parsons when they enter his cell. Ampleforth admits that he used the word "God" while revising a poem from Kipling, and Parsons says that his daughter overheard him saying "Down with Big Brother" in his sleep. The fact that two orthodox Party members at the extreme opposite ends of the intelligence spectrum are arrested suggests that personal security is nonexistent in Oceania, where the totalitarian government's primary goal is to completely control every citizen and exercise its power. No one is safe in Oceania, and the Party is willing to arrest, torture, or vaporize anybody in order to maintain a hysterical atmosphere. Whether or not Ampleforth and Parsons's arrests were warranted does not matter, and their unfortunate fate is another example of the Party's hostility and absolute power.

Last Updated by eNotes Editorial on
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

It would be difficult to find two characters more dissimilar than Ampleforth and Parsons. Ampleforth is a highly intelligent intellectual; Parsons is a fool of the first order who believes everything the Party has to say. Yet both end up arrested for thought crime. That two such opposite personalities could end up arrested shows that nobody is safe. Intelligence means nothing. Stupidity and loyalty to Party also mean nothing. The state considers everyone in it a potential enemy. The arrests, in their seeming randomness, are about spreading terror rather than dispensing any kind of justice. They are raw displays of the power of the state to exercise life and death over any subject for any reason.

Ampleforth's intelligence is on display when he speaks to Winston in prison. He uses nuanced words, such as "indiscretion." He also uses dangerous words, such as "definitive" in a society where nothing is ever definitive. He puts the needs of poetry ahead of the dictates of the Party. We can understand how he might end up vaporized:

"These things happen," he began vaguely. "I have been able to recall one instance—a possible instance. It was an indiscretion, undoubtedly. We were producing a definitive edition of the poems of Kipling. I allowed the word ‘God’ to remain at the end of a line. I could not help it!" he added most indignantly, raising his face to look at Winston. "It was impossible to change the line. The rhyme was ‘rod'. Do you realize that there are only twelve rhymes to ‘rod’ in the entire language? For days I had racked my brains. There WAS no other rhyme."

The expression on his face changed. The annoyance passed out of it and for a moment he looked almost pleased. A sort of intellectual warmth, the joy of the pedant who has found out some useless fact, shone through the dirt and scrubby hair.

"Has it ever occurred to you," he said, "that the whole history of English poetry has been determined by the fact that the English language lacks rhymes?"

Parsons, in contrast, seems like the perfect Party member, the epitome of what the Party wants. Earlier on, Winston thinks

Parsons, on the other hand, would never be vaporized.

Of course, Winston is wrong. Anybody can be vaporized. Though Parson has clearly been falsely accused by his young daughter, who reports him for saying "Down with Big Brother" in his sleep, he too is doomed.

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

Throughout the novel, Winston has been looking forward to "the place where there is no darkness" as a refuge from the distortion, hatred and suspicion under which everyone lives in Oceania.

It is revealed when they are all arrested and taken to a brightly lit antiseptic looking metal room--cold, uncomfy, and never dark. Certainly not a refuge.

Ampleforth is arrested for his inability to remove the word "God" from a line of poetry. Parsons is arrested for thoughtcrime and had been turned in by his own daughter.

These two men are arrested for seemingly innocent things. Ampleforth was simply trying to keep the rhyme scheme in Kipling's poem true, and Parsons claims to be proud of the daughter who accused him of thoughtcrime--something he says must have come upon him without his knowledge whatsoever.

No one is safe...there is no security in Oceania within the Party.

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team

We’ll help your grades soar

Start your 48-hour free trial and unlock all the summaries, Q&A, and analyses you need to get better grades now.

  • 30,000+ book summaries
  • 20% study tools discount
  • Ad-free content
  • PDF downloads
  • 300,000+ answers
  • 5-star customer support
Start your 48-Hour Free Trial