I am doing a debate and I need reasons why government should not provide funding for the homeless. Please help!

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

The government is in place to protect us, not to support us. Thus, throughout the beginning of this country, assisting the poor was always a private or communal function. It only became a function of government during the Great Depression when the private sector could no longer afford to help...

Unlock
This Answer Now

Start your 48-hour free trial to unlock this answer and thousands more. Enjoy eNotes ad-free and cancel anytime.

Start your 48-Hour Free Trial

The government is in place to protect us, not to support us. Thus, throughout the beginning of this country, assisting the poor was always a private or communal function. It only became a function of government during the Great Depression when the private sector could no longer afford to help others. In stronger financial times, the government has continued the policies despite the abuse and exploitation of the welfare system.

The government providing for a homeless person would diminish one's interest or motivation to provide for himself. It makes people dependent and encourages entitlement, rather than driving people to excel and be self-reliant.

Finally, helping the homeless doesn't often solve the problem because many homeless individuals are mentally ill. It is this area where the government would be better off in investing. Mental health and/or rehabilitation would better solve the problem.

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team