How successful was the Republican return to normalcy?hi, this is the latest question that has been raised in my history class, I was hoping someone could give me some strong arguments for both...

How successful was the Republican return to normalcy?

hi, this is the latest question that has been raised in my history class, I was hoping someone could give me some strong arguments for both sides- centred around the accomplishments and failings of the government to deal with social and economic issues predominantly in the period of the 1920’s. For example I was thinking that on the surface, President Coolidge’s Laissez-faire approach was perceived as positive (at the time) as he presided over the greatest economic boom in American history however, in a way, couldn’t it be argued that a neglect of the system and lack of regulations eventually lead to the cataclysmic effects of the great depression?

Any help is appreciated, thanks :)

1 Answer | Add Yours

saintfester's profile pic

saintfester | Middle School Teacher | (Level 3) Associate Educator

Posted on

“Normalcy” was a term coined by President Warren G. Harding during his presidential campaign. Republicans decided to play on isolationist wishes and anti-foreign feelings of most Americans following World War I by making this concept central to Harding’s presidential campaign. “A Return to Normalcy” had three components;

1)      An isolationist foreign policy (meaning the U.S. would not interact with other nations beyond trade)

2)      A renewing of Nativism (pro-American, anti-foreigner feelings. This was especially targeted towards Germans and Catholics)

3)      A rejection of progressive ideas (moving away from government activism)

These ideas really resonated with Americans, and Harding won the 1920 election handily. Normalcy during the Harding years was a economic success. Unemployment was reduced by 10% , government spending was cut, and peace was solidified between Germany , Japan and the U.S. These policies, along with bills creating more oversight into the Federal Budget, reversed the postwar recession and got the American economy back on track.

The negative side of Normalcy during the Harding administration was mostly social. Nativist attitudes resulted in negative consequences, especially for Catholics and Germans, who saw government pressure close schools, rename roads and harass citizens. Harding’s immigration bill reduced the number of immigrants coming to the U.S. substantially. Although Harding himself could hardly be called a racist, the Ku Klux Klan did see resurgence during this time, in part thanks to nativist attitudes.

During the Coolidge administration Normalcy came into full flower. Coolidge quipped, “The business of the American people is business” and this was no understatement. The Roaring 20’s saw huge upticks in the American economy as taxes and spending were further reduced and the economy bounded upwards. However, there was little to no government oversight. Coolidge saw the Federal Trade Commission and the Interstate Commerce Commission as barriers to business, and reduced their powers of oversight during his administration. Many historians see this as sowing the seeds for the eventual economic collapse that was the Great Depression. Without oversight, speculation in the stock market was able to run rampant, and poor Herbert Hoover was left holding the bag.

In summation, you are right in saying that Coolidge and Hardings "normalcy" policies were directly responsible for the impending crash despite short-term economic gains and profits for companies.

Sources:

We’ve answered 318,988 questions. We can answer yours, too.

Ask a question