How should the United States prosecute its war against global terrorism over the next several years? Should the United States become more aggressive in taking preemptive action in accordance with the Bush Doctrine? Or should the United States be more diplomatic in its engagement with foreign nations and take a soft power approach?

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

The problem with taking a softer approach is that it gives others the false impression that the Unites States is weak. The problem with being too aggressive is that we will give the impression that we are bullies. So the best answer lies probably somewhere in the middle. The United...

Unlock
This Answer Now

Start your 48-hour free trial to unlock this answer and thousands more. Enjoy eNotes ad-free and cancel anytime.

Start your 48-Hour Free Trial

The problem with taking a softer approach is that it gives others the false impression that the Unites States is weak. The problem with being too aggressive is that we will give the impression that we are bullies. So the best answer lies probably somewhere in the middle. The United States needs to protect itself against terrorism. We certainly do not want another 9/11 to happen or something worse. There is a lot of nuclear intelligence out there that could be disastrous if in the wrong hands. This country needs to be firm and consistent. The United States has a history of not backing down and I believe this is how we should remain. By the same token, we need to be fair and respectful at the same time.

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

This is a vitally important question and one that will evoke much in way of divergent response.  I think that whatever path the nation takes to prosecute the war on terrorism, it cannot lose sight of the most valuable commodity in such an equation.  On the ground, reliable intelligence will be critical in being able to find those who wish to do harm to America.  In my mind, there has to be an effective ground campaign which is devoted to gathering intelligence, forming alliances with the moderate forces in communities, and seeking to win over these social domains in our attempt to find the terrorists.  The idea of being able to fully grasp the enemy's capacity through "shock and awe" might not be as successful as originally thought.  Instead, using contacts we know are reliable, establishing incentives for moderate forces to be able to articulate that our war is not a war against a group of people or a religious belief system, and that liberalized democracy can bring more people into its folds with greater benefits to all might constitute a successful approach to prosecute and find those who wish to do us harm.

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team