In "A Rose for Emily" how much responsibility, if any, does the community bear for Miss Emily's crime?

Expert Answers info

M.P. Ossa eNotes educator | Certified Educator

calendarEducator since 2008

write5,648 answers

starTop subjects are Literature, Social Sciences, and Business

The first indication that there IS a sense of responsibility that is shared by the community is evident in the narrative of William Faulkner's "A Rose for Emily". The unnamed townsfolk narrator is actually a composite of all the voices and thoughts of Emily's community as it witnessed the decline and end of such an enigmatic woman.

Notice how the entire story is told from the "We" and "Us" perspective. This is because, as a representative of Jefferson County's golden age, Miss Emily is certainly that one vestige that remains constant in the psyche of the community as a whole. The result of her perennial presence is that the town now feels, not only connected, but somewhat responsible to watch out for her, and protect her, the way that they would protect any other object of affinity related to Jefferson.

Yet, that same narrative voice tells us how hard such a task is. Like a rose, Emily is rare and has thorns that prevent you from getting "too close". The combination of her upbringing, her overprotective and overbearing father, the limitations of her gender, and the sad alignment of life events, make her inaccessible to the rest of the world. For this reason, it is with much sadness that the narrator explains (almost as if excusing himself) how Jefferson had no choice but to let Emily go about her way. This is one of the reasons why, when Emily tried to hold on to her father's body after his death, the townsfolk narrator excuses Emily through the voice of their condoning:

We did not say she was crazy then. We believed she had to do that. We remembered all the young men her father had driven away and we knew that, with nothing left, she would have to cling to that which had robbed her, as people will.

This passage is perhaps the most embracing one we can find in the story. It clearly denotes the sense of responsibility and care that the town feels for Emily and it also serves as a way to, somehow, try to forgive her.

Let us not forget either that it was the townspeople, with the permission of the town officials, that powdered Emily's house with limestone when "the foul smell" coming out of her house started to bother the community. Although there was the option to confront Emily and reprimand her, maybe the people "knew" that Emily is a circumstantial victim of the environment of which they are also a part. Perhaps this, too, is another demonstration of the sense of responsibility that the town bear for Miss Emily.

check Approved by eNotes Editorial
favoritethings eNotes educator | Certified Educator

calendarEducator since 2016

write6,400 answers

starTop subjects are Literature, History, and Arts

I'm not convinced that the town ought to bear any responsibility for Miss Emily's crime of murdering Homer Barron. The old mayor Colonel Sartoris invented a reason why she would not have to pay taxes in the town out of a respectful sort of sympathy for Emily. Had Emily known about this act of charity, she "would [not] have accepted" it. We learn that

After her father's death [some thirty years prior] she went out very little; after her sweetheart went away, people hardly saw her at all. A few of the ladies had the temerity to call, but were not received [...].

Even during Emily's father's life "None of the young men were quite good enough for Miss Emily and such." In other words, then, Emily has always been set apart: first, evidently, by her father's own wishes and then, later, as a result of her own. She seemed to demand "more than ever the recognition of her dignity as the last Grierson," and so she holds herself at a significant remove from the vast majority of people in town, excepting her black servant, Tobe, and Homer, of course. Who could reach out to her? Who would she allow herself to turn to? There are none. She chooses her solitude, at least to an extent, and therefore I do not think we can attribute responsibility for her crime to anyone besides her own self. Emily could have put her prideful past behind her, but she would not.

check Approved by eNotes Editorial

Unlock This Answer Now