How is justice shown in Twelve Angry Men

In Twelve Angry Men, justice is shown when the jury concludes the defendant's innocence, having discussed the evidence and shared their views. Initially, most of the jurors are willing to vote quickly and, having done their civic duty, leave. Juror Eight refuses to take their shared responsibility this lightly. In discussing the case, many of the jurors’ prejudices are uncovered. They eventually are able to overcome their biases and jointly conclude an innocent verdict is warranted.

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

In the play Twelve Angry Men, it is arguable to say that justice is served in the end, despite of the opinions, perspectives, points of view, and schema of the twelve men who were responsible for the outcome of the trial.

The fact that justice was served is nothing short of a miracle, but it also denotes the power of incisive questioning, focus, and the indomitable character of Juror 8.

It is noteworthy to point out that justice is not a term to be used loosely in this play. Essentially, justice is no longer a treatment that will determine the outcome of a case.

In this particular case, justice is FATE; it will determine the kid's life and what it will become. This is why it is imperative that the jury is not only fair, but empathetic, humanistic, and responsible. Is this the case in the play? Sadly, not at first.

Since this is what is known as a "Murder One" case, or a capital murder case, it is, as it is said at the beginning of the play: "the most serious case tried in our criminal courts."

(The entire section contains 5 answers and 1354 words.)

Unlock This Answer Now

Start your 48-hour free trial to unlock this answer and thousands more. Enjoy eNotes ad-free and cancel anytime.

Start your 48-Hour Free Trial
Last Updated by eNotes Editorial on
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles
Last Updated by eNotes Editorial on