2 Answers | Add Yours
You're quite right. Victor and Henry are character foils. Here's how:
At school, Victor is the alazon, an impostor who thinks he is better than he really is. He rebels against traditional science and becomes self-obsessed with the dark arts. Henry is an eiron, a self-deprecator who is better than he appears to be. He humbly honors his professors and their fields of study.
In terms of Freudian psychoanalysis, Victor is the Id, the selfish one full of desire; Henry is the Superego, the conscience who reminds Victor to think of others, instead of himself. So says Enotes:
Victor's closest friend and companion, who balances his emotional and rational pursuits. He studies Oriental languages but passionately loves nature and life. Victor acknowledges that "[H]is wild and enthusiastic imagination was chastened by the sensibility of his heart." And unlike Victor, who wishes to learn "the secrets of heaven and earth," Clerval aspires "to become one among those whose names are recorded in story as the gallant and adventurous benefactors of our species."
In terms of knowledge, Victor is a man of science and Henry is a man of the arts. Victor is out to segregate himself from community: he works in grave yards and secret labs. Henry loves languages: his out to communicate with others.
In a sense, one can see Victor as representing science and Henry as representing the humanities. Victor is obsessed with new scientific and technological theories but pays little attention to the human costs of his activities. Henry, on the other hand, is mainly concerned with ethics.
Henry is more sensitive than Victor and aware of the needs and feelings of other people but less driven to act; his reluctance to impose his will and invade Victor's privacy contributes to the tragedies of the novel.
While Henry's great ambition is to do good and contribute to the community, Victor is selfish, focused mainly on succeeding in his own self-centered goals.
In terms of temperament, Henry is cheerful and sociable, while Victor is a melancholy loner.
Shelley sets up Henry as an ideal; he is handsome, sensitive, attuned to nature, and a great humanitarian. He appears almost too good to be true and is a somewhat one-dimensional character, functioning as little more than a foil and moral compass. His goodness makes his death and Victor's complicity in it more morally objectionable.
We’ve answered 319,864 questions. We can answer yours, too.Ask a question