To what extent is Mercutio responsible for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet in Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet?

Expert Answers info

Jonathan Beutlich, M.A. eNotes educator | Certified Educator

briefcaseTeacher (K-12), Professional Writer

bookB.A. from Calvin University

bookM.A. from Dordt University


calendarEducator since 2014

write5,955 answers

starTop subjects are Literature, Science, and History

The answer to this question is subject to the feelings and thoughts of individual audience members or readers. You are certainly welcome to argue that Mercutio should share some of the blame for the eventual deaths of both Romeo and Juliet. A person could argue that had Mercutio not fought Tybalt, he wouldn't have died. If Mercutio didn't die, then Romeo wouldn't kill Tybalt for revenge. If Romeo didn't kill Tybalt, then Romeo wouldn't be banished and cause events to spiral out of control. Personally, I don't agree with that reasoning. If Mercutio is partly to blame, then I also think it is appropriate to blame the weather. If the weather wasn't hot, Mercutio wouldn't have been stirring for a fight.

The day is hot, the Capulets abroad.
And if we meet, we shall not scape a brawl,

(The entire section contains 2 answers and 702 words.)

Unlock This Answer Now


Further Reading:

check Approved by eNotes Editorial

Tamara K. H. eNotes educator | Certified Educator

calendarEducator since 2010

write3,619 answers

starTop subjects are Literature, History, and Social Sciences







Further Reading:

check Approved by eNotes Editorial


akpeck71 | Student

I believe both were very responsible. The nurse facilitated Juliet getting out of the house and the friar did not get to Romeo in time to tell him that Juliet was not, in fact, dead, but would awake some time later.

check Approved by eNotes Editorial