How does race play a part in The Great Gatsby? How do you read Nick, finally? How sympathetic do you think he is toward Tom? Does Nick share or reject Tom’s ideas about race? Does the novel endorse or reject Tom’s ideas about race? As a point of reference, outside the Plaza Hotel, during the confrontation between Tom and Gatsby, Nick notes “the foreign clamor on the sidewalk” (143). Inside the hotel, Tom worries aloud about “intermarriage between black and white,” and Jordan reminds him, “We're all white here” (137). 

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

I tend to read Nick as being relatively unconcerned about race. It's true that he finds Tom to be morally repugnant, so much so that he doesn't even want to shake his hand near the book's end, but I don't think his revulsion has much, if anything, to do with...

See
This Answer Now

Start your 48-hour free trial to unlock this answer and thousands more. Enjoy eNotes ad-free and cancel anytime.

Get 48 Hours Free Access

I tend to read Nick as being relatively unconcerned about race. It's true that he finds Tom to be morally repugnant, so much so that he doesn't even want to shake his hand near the book's end, but I don't think his revulsion has much, if anything, to do with Tom's racism. If Gatsby does have a Jewish background, that isn't something that Nick would even be aware of until his real name is revealed late in the narrative, and by then, Nick's opinion of Gatsby is largely formed. We never see Nick taking a stand against Tom. Although, because Tom's character is described in such effusively negative terms, it seems clear that the book takes a stand against him and his values. However, I wouldn't say that he's condemned any more for being a racist than he is for being unfaithful to his wife or snobbish and self-centered. His overt racism is just another facet of his despicable character.

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

From the early pages of the novel, Tom's racism provides a backdrop to the action. When Nick visits him for the first time after moving to Long Island, Tom says he believes the "Nordic" races, to whom he attributes the development of civilization, are in danger of being overrun by nonwhites. 

This is important because Gatsby, originally named Gatz, may well have a Jewish or Semitic background, meaning he would not be Nordic. We learn early in the novel that Tom has a narrow idea of who qualifies as "Nordic" when he hesitates for a moment even before including Daisy, his own wife, in that group. 

In this passage at the Plaza, Tom insinuates that Gatsby is not Nordic. At this point, he understands that Daisy and Gatsby have been having an affair. He says he won't "sit back and let Mr. Nobody from Nowhere [Gatsby] make love" to Daisy. Immediately after this, he makes his remark about racial intermarriage, which he thinks is a terrible idea. To Tom, breaking up Daisy and Gatsby is about more than saving his own marriage: it is saving society from racial destruction. 

Nick and the novel both reject Tom's racism. This is clear because the person Nick, and the novel, most romanticize is Gatsby, the man Tom overflows with contempt for to the extent he can hardly stand to be near him. For Nick, however, Gatsby is the heroic, if flawed and tragic, emblem of the American Dream, a figure he admires in spite of himself. He says of Gatsby, "there was something gorgeous about him, some heightened sensitivity to the promises of life."

Nick, on the other hand, dislikes Tom intensely. He continually casts him as brutal, unintelligent, hypocritical, snobbish, entitled and racist, and early in the book dismisses him with one the classical disses in American literature: "one of those men who reach such an acute limited excellence at 21 that everything afterward savors of anti-climax." Nick continually portrays Tom as the quintessential buzzkill: to be around Tom is to be in misery. From the start, Nick describes his old college friend as having "arrogant eyes" and "effeminate swank ... a cruel body." 

In the end, Nick is an unreliable narrator who lacks the self-awareness to understand that his "cardinal virtue" is not his "honesty." We can't know for certain whether or not he is too hard on Tom, but Tom's own actions tend to bear out Nick's subjective feelings that Tom is a repugnant human being.  

 

 

 

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team