How does Orwell compare Animal Farm under Napoleon's leadership to its exploited state under Farmer Jones's rule?

4 Answers | Add Yours

trayducateng14's profile pic

trayducateng14 | Middle School Teacher | (Level 1) Adjunct Educator

Posted on

I agree. It's much worse especially since the propoganda that was used by the pigs to convince the other animals that they were being mistreated, abused, etc. is the same things that they themselves are doing to their own kind. In fact, that is the exact definition of irony. The outcome is expected to be different because of the change that was brought about but it was more tyrannical and hypocritical than before.

timbrady's profile pic

timbrady | College Teacher | (Level 1) Educator

Posted on

It's the same thing ... perhaps worse.  I say worse because under Jones the oppression came from another species or class.  When Napoleon takes over he is one of their own and he offers them hope that things will be better with new leadership.  What the animals finally wind up seeing is that the problem isn't with who is the leader, but with the whole problem of leadership.  They also learn that what those who seek to lead them say often has no bearing on what actually happens in the end.  At least Jones made them no promises; Napoleon offered them a better life, an earthly paradise, and delivered them Jones II.

lolipopfeya's profile pic

lolipopfeya | Student, Grade 9 | eNotes Newbie

Posted on

i tink animal farm is really boring


kevin18's profile pic

kevin18 | Student | eNotes Newbie

Posted on

lk guys can u answer my ques.??I'm in a hurry plzzz answer as soon as possible.

Discuss the animal's condition under napoleon's leadership

We’ve answered 320,053 questions. We can answer yours, too.

Ask a question