Macbeth Questions and Answers
by William Shakespeare

Macbeth book cover
Start Your Free Trial

How does Macbeth have a greater capacity for evil than Lady Macbeth? some examples to go along with reasons would also be helpful

Expert Answers info

Bruce Bergman eNotes educator | Certified Educator

briefcaseCollege Professor


calendarEducator since 2011

write3,640 answers

starTop subjects are Literature, Social Sciences, and Business

I would argue that Lady Macbeth's suicide is further and final indication of her "greater capacity for evil". In this act, she abandons her husband to deal with his crime and his guilt alone.

She pushed him on to the crime then left him holding the bag.

check Approved by eNotes Editorial

mwestwood, M.A. eNotes educator | Certified Educator

bookM.A. from The University of Alabama


calendarEducator since 2006

write16,150 answers

starTop subjects are Literature, History, and Social Sciences

It is ironic indeed that Lady Macbeth proves incapable of living with their evil deeds than Macbeth since in Act I she has ridiculed her husband for his unmanliness as he reconsiders his decision to assassinate King Duncan.  Seeming coldly cruel, she tells Macbeth that had she sworn to an act, she would even kill her suckling babe if necessary. Yet, she is mentally weaker than her husband who travels his bloody path until he himself is killed.

check Approved by eNotes Editorial

Lorna Stowers eNotes educator | Certified Educator

calendarEducator since 2011

write4,625 answers

starTop subjects are Literature, Social Sciences, and History

I also believe that while Lady Macbeth seems more evil initially, Macbeth does possess the greater capacity for evil. Macbeth, unlike Lady Macbeth, excludes her from his plans ("Be innocent of the knowledge, dearest chuck."). Lady Macbeth needs her husband to "be evil." Macbeth, on the other hand, does not need his wife.

check Approved by eNotes Editorial

accessteacher eNotes educator | Certified Educator

calendarEducator since 2009

write13,728 answers

starTop subjects are Literature, Social Sciences, and History

I would argue that although Lady Macbeth starts off as being greater in terms of her capacity for evil, very quickly in Act III we see Macbeth showing his own inner potential for evil as he begins to plot his own murders without consulting with his wife and working more and more independently. In addition, I think we can see a definite escalation of the kind of crimes he commits. He moves from killing Duncan with his own hands to employing others to kill to finally slaughtering whole households.

check Approved by eNotes Editorial

Robert C. Evans eNotes educator | Certified Educator

calendarEducator since 2009

write2,994 answers

starTop subjects are Literature, History, and Social Sciences

Initially, at least, Lady Macbeth seems the more evil of the two -- so evil that her husband seems shocked at the arguments she uses when she tries to convince him to commit the murders. Later, though, she does seem to feel very guilty -- so much so that she is basically absent from the very end of the play.

check Approved by eNotes Editorial

litteacher8 eNotes educator | Certified Educator

calendarEducator since 2008

write15,967 answers

starTop subjects are Literature, History, and Social Sciences

You could also argue that Lady Macbeth's guilt is an indication of a lesser capacity for evil. Guilt is a product of the conscience, and I would say that less conscience equals more capacity for evil. Lady Macbeth is undone by her guilt. It drives her mad, meaning she cannot handle evil.

check Approved by eNotes Editorial

coachingcorner eNotes educator | Certified Educator

calendarEducator since 2008

write1,346 answers

starTop subjects are Literature, Social Sciences, and History

Some critics might say Macbeth has a greater capacity for evil than Lady MacBeth because when he reaches the point of no return, we see him question himslef and his plans. He considers his position, his options and examines his 'conscience' (if he has one, that too is permanently up for debate!) and then decides to continue his evil path. Either William Shakespeare is trying to show us that MacBeth is fully aware of his 'sin' or 'evil-doing' and is therefore culpable - or that he is mad. The jury is still out.

check Approved by eNotes Editorial