1 Answer | Add Yours
I think that David Lurie is the embodiment of change as he is forced to accept the fact that the South African dynamic is one that no longer favors someone like himself. The established white male had dominated South African social and political spheres for so long that he had understood his own position as one that almost existed beyond change. In David Lurie's case, his means of communication included patterns of recognition where change was not needed. From being a professor of communication, David is forced to change to becoming a student of it, seeking new and effective ways to communicate the new realities that besiege him. Over the course of the novel, he is forced to accept that there is change both outside of him and inside his own sense of self. He is forced to accept his own "disgrace," in that he is not the embodiment of Byronic womanizing with which he might have viewed himself. Additionally, he is compelled to understand that his own position in the white male reservoir of power is something that has undergone change as the fabric and landscape of South Africa changes. David is forced to accept the change that happens when one becomes victimized and is unable to fully grasp or understand the extent of the victimization. When Lucy contends that he will never understand what happened, it is a signal to change that reflects how much the dynamic within which he lives has changed and how he must adapt to that. In that, David Lurie exemplifies change on multiple levels.
We’ve answered 319,863 questions. We can answer yours, too.Ask a question