How did American isolationism and neutrality actually contribute to the spread of WWII?How did American isolationism and neutrality actually contribute to the spread of WWII?

Expert Answers
pohnpei397 eNotes educator| Certified Educator

There is no way to conclusively prove that US isolationism and neutrality actually contributed to the spread of the war.  However, you can argue that the US could have prevented the spread of war if it had made clear to Germany and Japan that it would fight them if they took any aggressive actions towards their neighbors.

The logic behind this is that a US ultimatum like this would have scared Germany and Japan and prevented them from taking the actions that led to war.  For example, if the US had credibly threatened war with Japan if Japan moved into China, you can argue that Japan would not have made this move and WWII might have been less likely.

However, this seems unlikely since the US was hardly in position to attack Germany or Japan.  That makes it very unlikely that either country would have been scared by US threats.  In order for this to have worked, the US would have to have built a huge military machine even in peace time so as to scare the Axis.

Ashley Kannan eNotes educator| Certified Educator

This is a very interesting question.  I think that one could argue that American isolationism's fear of getting involved in a protracted conflict actually helped to cause one.  The reality was that the 1930s in Europe was a decade dominated by the singular, charismatic leader.  Democracies did not stand a chance given the economic, social, and psychological fragmentation that gripped Europe in the wake of the First World War.  Leaders popped up all over Europe and sought to build consensus and dominate through the overtaking of nations and the expansionist model of nation building.  American isolationism ended up feeding into this growing advance.  For example, Hitler's desires to appropriate more land and expand Germany through military aggression were goals that were emboldened with American isolationism.  The tenet of America not seeking involvement amounted to a silent nod to aggression.  In this, war became a distinct and more definable reality.

brettd eNotes educator| Certified Educator
World War II was the result of a complex series of events, and while a historian can make the argument that, without American isolationism, the war might not have started, I feel that argument is vastly oversimplified. Let's remember that Hitler and Tojo both did not feel that the United States had the unity or will to fight. The Japanese leadership felt America would roll over after the devastating attack at Pearl Harbor, and Hitler felt that the war would be over before the US might be able to bring decisive force to the table militarily. Both were massive miscalculations. I would say the Treaty of Versailles had more to do with the beginning of World War II than American isolationism.
litteacher8 eNotes educator| Certified Educator
The main argument is that if the United States had joined the war earlier we might have stopped Hitler and kept the war from spreading. Maybe if we had entered the European theater earlier, Hitler would not have been able to expand as easily as he did. If we had allied with the Russians and attacked from all sides, or somehow executed Hitler, we might have stopped the war.