1 Answer | Add Yours
Chapters 21 and 22 are best understood after reading the whole novel because they not only outline what the author is in the progress of learning through Pi's story, but mention "the better story," which is later referred to by Pi at the end of the book. These chapters connect the end of the book to the essence of what is learned by Pi. They also discuss God and the difference between the beliefs of an Agnostic person to those of an Athiest's. In the end, each person must decide what s/he will believe about the story of life. One person may choose to view his/her life's story as positive, negative, or purely scientific, as drawn by the difference between an Atheist's and an Agnostic's death. In Martel's analogy, the Atheist switches at the very end to believe that the light he sees at death is God; whereas, the Agnostic could cling to his belief that the white lite of death is merely the brain's failure to endure--a scientific effect, if you will. The connection between this analogy and Pi's two endings to his story seem to be the same. A reader can choose to believe the animal story or the human story, it's up to him/her.
We’ve answered 318,960 questions. We can answer yours, too.Ask a question