# How can I calculate the relative abundance of three isotopes? The letters have nothing to do with the periodic table. 22y = 22.341 amu, 23y = 23.041 amu, 24y = 24.941 amu, average y = 23.045 amu. Denote the abundances in numbers (not percent) as `a_22,` `a_23` and `a_24.` Then if we assume that there are no other isotopes found in nature,

`a_22+a_23+a_24=1.`

Also, by the definition of relative atomic mass:

`23.045 = 22.341*a_22+23.041*a_23+24.941*a_24.`

There is no more information and we have only two linear equations for three...

Start your 48-hour free trial to unlock this answer and thousands more. Enjoy eNotes ad-free and cancel anytime.

Denote the abundances in numbers (not percent) as `a_22,` `a_23` and `a_24.` Then if we assume that there are no other isotopes found in nature,

`a_22+a_23+a_24=1.`

Also, by the definition of relative atomic mass:

`23.045 = 22.341*a_22+23.041*a_23+24.941*a_24.`

There is no more information and we have only two linear equations for three unknowns. Usually this means infinitely many solutions.

From the first equation `a_22=1-a_23-a_24,` substitute it into the second equation:

`23.045 = 22.341*(1-a_23-a_24)+23.041*a_23+24.941*a_24,` or

`23.045- 22.341=(23.041-22.341)*a_23+(24.941-22.341)*a_24,` or

`0.704=0.7*a_23+2.6*a_24.`

Therefore `a_23=(0.704-2.6*a_24)/0.7 approx 1.006-3.714*a_24.` So if we would know `a_24` (or `a_23,` or `a_22`), we could find the other abundances.

To find the relative abundances in percent, we have to multiply `a_24,` `a_23` and `a_22` by `100.` The formal answer for your question is "not enough data." Also note that the atomic masses of isotopes are almost always integers, while your numbers aren't.

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team