Rearranging q = 9 - (1/8)*p, the price p is given by p = 8*(9-q)
where q is the number of items sold.
The total sales income on q items sold is q*p = 8q*(9-q)
Therefore the profit R(q) on q items sold is total sales(q) -cost(q) = q*p - C(q)
So `R(q) = 8q(9-q) - 1/3q^3 + 4.5q^2 - 12q - 18`
` ` ` = -1/3q^3 + 4.5q^2 - 12q - 18 +72q - 8q^2`
`= -1/3q^3 +(4.5-8)q^2 + (72-12)q - 18 = -1/3q^3 - 3.5q^2 +60q - 18`
To find the turning points on the profit curve R, we differentiate R and set to zero.
`d/(dq)R(q) = -3(1/3)q^2 + 2(-3.5)q + 60 = -q^2 - 7q + 60`
Therefore the turning points on the profit curve R are ` `where
`-(q^2 + 7q -60) = 0`
We could use the quadratic formula at this point to solve this, but by inspection you might see that
`-(q-5)(q+12) = 0`
because 12-5 = 7 and -5 x 12 = -60
This means that the turning points are at q=5 and q=-12. The number of items sold must be positive, so we will only investigate the turning point at q=5.
Is it a maximum or a miminum? Check the second derivative
Differentiating again we get
`d^2/(dq^2)R(q) = -2q - 7`
At q=5, this is equal to -17 which is negative, meaning that the gradient is decreasing at this point so the turning point is indeed a maximum.
The profit when q=5 items are sold is
`R(5) = -1/3 5^3 -(3.5)5^2 + 60(5) -18 = 152.83`
Maximum profit 152.83