From a functionalist perspective, why is social stratification necessary in society?

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

Functionalism basically argues that each aspect of a society has a function and is necessary to the society.  Functionalists tend to argue that social stratification is necessary because it allows people to be rewarded for hard work and talent.

If a society were unstratified, everyone would essentially be equal.  This...

Unlock
This Answer Now

Start your 48-hour free trial to unlock this answer and thousands more. Enjoy eNotes ad-free and cancel anytime.

Start your 48-Hour Free Trial

Functionalism basically argues that each aspect of a society has a function and is necessary to the society.  Functionalists tend to argue that social stratification is necessary because it allows people to be rewarded for hard work and talent.

If a society were unstratified, everyone would essentially be equal.  This would mean that the least talented, laziest person in a society would be essentially equal to the most talented, hardest working person.  This would, it is argued, destroy people's incentive to work.  No one would want to work because they would not gain anything by working.  Because of this, it is necessary to have social stratification in a society.

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team