For what reasons might we agree that in some respects Claudius is a good King?

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

Intriguing question. Are you familiar with the term "Machiavellian"? Machiavelli was a Renaissance writer who wrote very realistically about politics at a time when most people were writing idealistically. He wrote about rulers who did what they needed to do to obtain power. (It's more complicated than that, but that's...

Unlock
This Answer Now

Start your 48-hour free trial to unlock this answer and thousands more. Enjoy eNotes ad-free and cancel anytime.

Start your 48-Hour Free Trial

Intriguing question. Are you familiar with the term "Machiavellian"? Machiavelli was a Renaissance writer who wrote very realistically about politics at a time when most people were writing idealistically. He wrote about rulers who did what they needed to do to obtain power. (It's more complicated than that, but that's a start.) From a Machiavellian point of view, Claudius can be respected, simply because he did what it was necessary to do to be king. He took the throne. He's efficient. He also speaks well, layering rhetoric over his actions to make them seem appealing. Finally, he tries to follow up on things once they get out of hand—sending Hamlet away, observing things first hand, etc. He's active, rather than passive.

Of course, this all falls apart later on, because no good king wants his kingdom to look like his does in the last act.

Greg

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team