Double Indemnity

by James M. Cain
Start Free Trial

In the films Double Indemnity and Raise the Red Lantern, analyze and compare their gendered representations and similar themes/features. • What roles do women play in both films? What causes them to behave the way they do? • How are men presented in both films? • Consider the femme fatale. Is she present in both films? • How does the Oedipal complex narrative compare in both films? • What kind of relationships exist in both films? Which characters are more empowered? Why is that so?

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

The femme fatale is a classic stereotype of film noir, and the character of Phyllis Dietrichson in Double Indemnity is the classic example. She is seductive and deadly, and she uses her looks and sexual powers to trap the men in her life, to seduce them, and then ultimately to...

See
This Answer Now

Start your 48-hour free trial to unlock this answer and thousands more. Enjoy eNotes ad-free and cancel anytime.

Get 48 Hours Free Access

The femme fatale is a classic stereotype of film noir, and the character of Phyllis Dietrichson in Double Indemnity is the classic example. She is seductive and deadly, and she uses her looks and sexual powers to trap the men in her life, to seduce them, and then ultimately to betray them. She pretends to be helpless and to want the men’s protection and control, but clearly, she is the one who controls them. As the story unfolds, Phyllis is shown to be not at all the helpless woman she pretends to be but rather conniving, manipulative, and deadly.

Phyllis is objectified, but she is objectified because she wants to be. She realizes that it is exactly this objectification that gives her power over men, and she recognizes male lust as weakness. In Raise the Red Lantern, the women are clearly objectified, but their objectification is built into society and they accept it as the natural order. These women are manipulative because they’re fighting for the same man, thus they manipulate each other in order to win the favor of the man. They struggle to gain power over each other; in other words, they don’t fight the subjugation and oppression by their husbands. In feudal Korean society, the man of the house held all the power; he could have as many wives as he wanted, though each wife was required to be loyal only to him. Those women continued to fight their oppression, but within the limits of the social structure that controlled them. They gained power—or believed they gained power—by overpowering the other women, and by extension, using their seductive powers to win the affections of the man.

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team