Feudalism: societal needs and social and political trendsWhat societal needs and social and political trends were involved in the development of feudalism? What social problems did feudalism...

Feudalism: societal needs and social and political trends

What societal needs and social and political trends were involved in the development of feudalism? What social problems did feudalism create, as well as solve, in western European societies? 

Societal Needs –

Social Trends –

Political Trends –

 

Asked on by moocow554

7 Answers | Add Yours

litteacher8's profile pic

litteacher8 | High School Teacher | (Level 3) Distinguished Educator

Posted on

Feudalism caused for everyone to have an association and protected the social order. It kept everything organized and in line. The lords kept the peasants in lne, and everyone looked out for his or her own interests. It allowed the powerful to stay powerful.
enotechris's profile pic

enotechris | College Teacher | (Level 2) Senior Educator

Posted on

Feudalism resulted from the disintegration of the Roman Empire in the West, and lasted from the Fall of Rome until the Renaissance. As the Roman aristocracy throughout the Empire abandoned the principal cities (Rome began a long period of depopulation staring around the year 500) they reestablished themselves on country estates.  As economies worsened throughout the West, to the point of almost no trade occurring, each estate began to be self-sufficient -- because trade had disappeared, the only value left was in the land. Since someone had to produce on the land, and someone had to secure the land, two offices of lord and serf were established.  The last unifying force in the West, the Roman Church, provided the the last office of priests and bishops to round out the categories of Feudal society.

kplhardison's profile pic

Karen P.L. Hardison | College Teacher | eNotes Employee

Posted on

One of the political causes of feudalism--the agreement between nobles of the warrior class that disregarded peasants--was invasion from other, competing powers. When kings, vassals, and fiefs were all united by service agreements with each other (kings granted lands to vassals and fief, thus making them empowered land owners, in exchange for military and other governmental services), they could present a united successful combat force to invaders. Taxation became important in developing a feudal community comprising people below the noble class level who needed help paying their taxes and besought the help of the manorial vassal or fief lord who would pay the tax in exchange for servitude that was usually in the form of labor on the land. This taxation/labor exchange effectively reduced the middle class.

http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/06058c.htm

wannam's profile pic

wannam | High School Teacher | (Level 3) Educator

Posted on

I agree that feudalism developed, in part, because the people needed a way to police themselves.  The feudal society developed a code of conduct that people stuck to with strict rigidity.  It helped the society develop and laid the foundation for later laws and societal structure.  Of course, placing the power in the hands of few does tend to lead to corruption and inequality.  The peasants had no say in the ruling of the lands they worked and lived on.  The Lords and upper class held all the power.  Eventually, this inequality and the anger it generated would lead to the downfall of the feudal society.

accessteacher's profile pic

accessteacher | High School Teacher | (Level 3) Distinguished Educator

Posted on

Well, one of the biggest central problems is of course the massive inequality that was created and the difficulties that there were in ensuring equal care and protection of serfs. The system enabled some lords to become incredibly rapacioius and abuse their responsibilities towards their charges, rather than protect them and ensure their wellbeing.

rrteacher's profile pic

rrteacher | College Teacher | (Level 2) Educator Emeritus

Posted on

Modern historians don't really like the term "feudalism" all that much, they prefer "lordship" instead, which was equally reciprocal. Medieval people didn't use the term, or really conceive of it as we do. That said, whatever you call it, historians emphasize the mutual obligations that fulfill both societal and social needs. The institutions that we call feudalism provided for property protection, legal services, revenue raising, and even in many cases, religion, since many bishops were lords as well. All of these services came at the cost of either military service or, more often, payment in kind. The important thing to understand (and maybe a "problem" under the terms of the original question) is that throughout most of the medieval period, the system actually tended to weaken most kings, who were often far less powerful than the lords who supposedly owed them fealty. The concept of "country" or "state" as we would imagine it today was basically antithetical to this system, even though some particularly powerful, ruthless, and charismatic monarchs (e.g. Philip Augustus of France, Henry II and III of England) began to transform their demesnes into what we'd recognize today as modern bureaucratic states.

pohnpei397's profile pic

pohnpei397 | College Teacher | (Level 3) Distinguished Educator

Posted on

Feudalism was developed because there was a need for people to fight for the kings as well as the need for people to act as the keepers of law and order in various parts of kingdoms.  This was a time when economies were not strong enough to simply have a centralized standing army to fight for the king.  Kings also did not have enough power or any really effective means of keeping law and order in every part of their country.  Therefore, feudalism developed.

We’ve answered 318,949 questions. We can answer yours, too.

Ask a question