Explain the difference between direct and indirect democracy and cite examples of each. Do we need more or less direct democracy?Explain the difference between direct and indirect democracy and...
Explain the difference between direct and indirect democracy and cite examples of each. Do we need more or less direct democracy?
There is a difference between a direct and an indirect democracy. In a direct democracy, individuals make all the decisions themselves. For example, they will vote on proposed laws. In ancient Greece, there were some examples of direct democracies in some of the city-states that existed. Today, a direct democracy can be seen when people vote on a referendum to exceed the tax limit set by law. In local school districts in Wisconsin, the voters must approve the budget and tax levy for a school district. All voters in the school district may attend the meeting and vote on these issues.
An indirect democracy is when we elect representatives to make the laws for us such as in Congress or in the state legislatures. These representatives should listen to what the majority of their constituents tell them and then vote according to the wishes of a majority of the voters. This system is easier than a direct democracy since it would be difficult to assemble all of the voters of a city, state, or country every time an issue needed to be decided.
I feel we don’t need more direct democracy. It would be very difficult to assemble all voters every time an issue needed to be decided. Also, with a direct democracy, too many issues, which may be only a concern for a handful of people, might constantly be brought forward for a vote and, therefore, a gathering of the voters.
Direct democracy is when the people vote directly on the laws or other issues that are proposed. Indirect democracy is when the people elect representatives who vote on laws on the behalf of the people.
An example of indirect democracy is when we elect people to Congress to represent us.
An example of direct democracy is the initiative or referendum process. This is similar to the process by which California banned gay marriages last year.
In my opinion, many states, especially in the West, could use less direct democracy. California is a prime example. There seem to me to be too many ballot issues and they are generally placed on the ballot by organizations with enough money to pay for signatures to be gathered to get the measures on the ballot. Then people vote for these often complicated measures without having enough knowledge to fully understand the impact of the measures.
So I do not think the average person knows enough to have an informed opinion on most ballot issues. Simple issues, like gay marriage, are okay, but complicated ones are best left to people who have time to become somewhat expert on the issues.