Examine Atwood's prose style, paying special attention to language as an element of narration in The Edible Woman.
Though some might regard this as a negative criticism (which it's not intended to be), Atwood's language in The Edible Woman might often be called "unremarkable." For the most part, she gives us a straightforward narration without frills, obscurity, or the imaginative extensions of reality we find in, say, Virginia Woolf. She gives a realistic account of an arc, so to speak, of crisis through which a woman travels.
Probably the book many readers would find similarities to in The Edible Woman is Sylvia Plath's The Bell Jar. But Atwood's story views people through a less caricatured lens than Plath's. Both writers use understatement . Atwood's story has a subtext of absurdity which does not need special commentary or self-analysis to explain it. In addition, the shift to third-person narration in the middle of the novel is done so smoothly that one does not feel any disconnect with the story as it has been told so...
(The entire section contains 489 words.)
check Approved by eNotes Editorial