Absolutely. Hop Frog not only gets to humiliate the councilmen of the King, and the King himself, but he also gets to insult them to their faces, scare them, disarm them, and put them in an extremely vulnerable position, right before he ultimately finishes them off.
He manages to do all this under the guise of complaisance. This means that, at all times while the ultimate prank is planned, he pretends to be in agreement with the not-so-intelligent King. He also allows the King's equally asinine consultants to believe that they are a vital part of the dwarf's plan for a superb masquerade trick.
Made to drink wine against his will, Hop Frog is already on edge with the King and the Council at the time that they are planning this huge ball. Hence, in anger, and with a clear plan in mind, he suggests a clever way for all 8 men to dress up as Orangutans and to be put in chains to "scare off the ladies".
The first humiliation comes in the actual suggestion of the costume. Hop Frog essentially calls these men "apes" to their face by suggesting that they would make good orangutans.
The second form of humiliation comes from the costume, itself. Hop Frog suggests tarring the men so that the element serves as a binding substance for what would become "the skin" of the orangutans. The words "tarring and feathering" are used together, which suggests the medieval act of public humiliation. Ultimately, the feathers are switched to "flax", which is highly combustible.
The king and his ministers were first encased in tight-fitting stockinet shirts and drawers. They were then saturated with tar. At this stage of the process, some one of the party suggested feathers; but the suggestion was at once overruled by the dwarf [...]
The the third form of revenge then came from chaining the men. The use of the chain is suggestive of placing the men in the position of wild animals.
To let his revenge set in perfectly, Hop Frog leaves the men alone, waiting until midnight to start their act. Just imagine for a moment a King and his council men chained up and dressed up like apes, awkwardly waiting in isolation for hours. It is as embarrassing as it is hilarious.
Finally, the act of revenge is completed when Hop Frog sets the "monkeys" on fire after gathering them together in a close enclosure over all of the masqueraders. The jester also identifies the men prior to doing his final deed. He says,
They are a great king and his seven privy-councillors, -- a king who does not scruple to strike a defenceless girl and his seven councillors who abet him in the outrage. [...] I am simply Hop-Frog, the jester -- and this is my last jest.
In typical Poe fashion, the last act would be macabre and horrific.
Poe tests many social constructs with this story, and perhaps he is lucky to be an American in the 19th century when he decided to write a story about kings and councilmen getting burned alive. He would have received a very harsh punishment had he been in England, for example, anywhere until the 19th century writing about such a topic.
Nevertheless, the words to describe Hop Frog's revenge are: "exacting", because he planned his deed down to the last detail; "vindictive" because he was quite motivated, hungered, to get his revenge; "morbid", because he chose drastic and bloody measures to do it. Hop Frog definitely gets his revenge, and he enjoyed it quite a lot.