I have the feeling that Tennessee Williams stacked the cards against Blanche. She is a fading Southern belle who has lost her home and her job. She is looking for a home and a little security. In Stanley Kowalski she is pitted against a ruthless and brutal antagonist. He could have defeated her with his raw animal power and the hold this gives him over his wife Stella, who is the bone of contention, or MacGuffin, in the play. But Stanley easily finds out that Blanche has a terribly unsavory past, that she was fired from her teaching job for immoral conduct with minor boys, and that she had the worst reputation of any woman in her town. This seems like a little bit too much. It makes Stanley's victory too easy. She was depending on marrying Mitch, but it is easy for Stanley to turn him against her too. Even Stella is disillusioned and is no longer an ally. Stanley was certainly at fault for raping Blanche, but he wouldn't have done it if he hadn't found out about her flagrantly immoral behavior.
I suppose any answers to this question depend on the definition of "win." The above posts each define this term in different ways. My immediate response was to argue that Stanley did not win in the end for the reasons stated in Post #2. However, Post #6 brings up a strong point about Stanley's claiming the weaker person and therefore "winning" the battle. Still, I think there are no winners here, and that the end of the play shows three characters marred by their inability to give up their disillusionment about their own lives.
In terms of Tennessee Williams's being a Naturalist and believing in social determinism, Stanley as the strongest of the species--the audience hears in Scene 10 "the inhuman jungle voices"--is the winner. In his mind, he probably would say that Blanche deserved what has happened; in fact, he tells Blanche,
We've had this date with each other from the beginning!
Like the conquered female, Blanche moans and she sinks to her knees. Stanley claims his victim. A brute, he takes what is weaker without remorse. Stella, who has spent their lifetime together excusing his behavior, does so again, refusing to accept what Blanche, a fallen woman, tells her about her husband.
These are some great points. Honestly, my opinion has changed since reading them through. My initial reaction prior to reading these posts is that Stanley did win. The complexities and frailties of human emotion have been wiped out in the face of the boors and brutes that have the power. Yet, I agree with the second post in that Stanley has been seen as a rapist and loser. Stella stays with him in order to keep her illusion intact. The last post on Blanche was a nice one, as well, in that perhaps Blanche has found some sanctuary in that she is alone and away from a harsh and uncaring world. I do have to temper this with Williams' own predispositions that commitment to a mental institution was something that represented a fairly dead end, with his own experience in allowing his sister to be institutionalized. Yet, I can see this reading of Blanche as being finally delivered some level of redemption from the challenges of society by escaping it. These are some really great posts.
In terms of Stella's allegiance, Stanley has won. This is sad given that Stella is at least partly aware of what he did. When Blanche is taken away, Stella says something to Eunice about having to believe Stanley in order to keep living with him. If I recall correctly, she also indicates that there is no other option. Stella is hinting that, on some level, she has made a choice.
In terms of Blanche, though, illusion has not been destroyed. Blanche would rather retreat into herself than actually face the reality that Stanley represents.
I believe there are no winners in this play. There are just human beings who have to face the sad realities of their lives. Blanche has been exposed as an alcoholic who has some kind of mental illness. Stanley has been exposed as a rapist and a loser. And poor Stella has to face the fact of what her husband and her sister are. I don't think Williams was trying to teach us anything; he was just showing us what reality is like for some people.
stanley stands up for what he believes in throughout the course of the play and Blanche stands up for illusion or fantasy, the clash between the two leads to the horrific consequences of Stanley raping her and getting away with it, and also Blanche getting institutionalised. At the same time Blance doesn't know whats going on she tells the doctor when he comes to take her away
"i have always depended on the kindness of strangers"
which sums up everything about Blanche's shadowed past
Stella is faced with two decisions at the end of the play to either beleive Blance that Stanley raped her or Not beleive her. She chooses to stay with stanley because of the "alpha male figure" that he can provide for her without question daily the "meat" Also as well Stella has a baby boy and needs Stanley to be her rock she has choosen Stanley over her own sister and she sends her sister herself to the mental instituition for she says "what have i done" as she runs after Blanche at the end who disappears round the corner.
All posts are nice.. But how can Stanley be a loser?
"exposed",Stella decides to take his side in the rape. He still has his car,home,friends and his wife at the end.. plus the bonus-a baby boy,as he wished.. He has suceeded in his aim,destroying Blanche.Eversince he overheard her insulting him to incite Stella to leave him,he bred hatred for her,made research in her past,and made all possible for Blanche to go from their lives. She had insulted him,his friends and was influencing his wife.. was a menace to him. In the end Blanche is taken away,Stella stays,his friends are playing poker, Tennesse gives a sense of normality in the introduction of scene11 afterall.. he has Everthing he wants compared to Stella who loses a sister and Blanche everything...Stanley has suceeded in defending his small world..
I agree with you!!!