Do you think Shakespeare should still be taught in schools?    

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

I think it's important to teach Shakespeare.  First of all, the students always enjoy it.  I think they feel important, because they are now in the know.  The other important reason is that they are very teachable- there's a lot of meat to them, and they are alluded to often in our culture.

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

There is a reason that William Shakespeare is still taught. His writing was phenomenal for his time, and it has stood the test of time. However, teachers tend to forget that he was a poet as well, and many phrases students are familiar with originated with Shakespeare, as did some words they might know. Does this mean that his works have to be taught in their entirety? Probably not. Certainly some are worth forging through to the very end, but others could be taught focusing only on certain portions.

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

No one author teaches us more of life than Shakespeare.  As post #3 states, Shakespeare is essential to the understanding of other texts, even in something as basic as the title as over a thousand titles come from lines in Shakespeare. 

In addition, there is a beauty to the Elizabethan language that should be preserved.  For, it not only pleases the senses, but it teaches us much about our Modern English as its ancestor.  It is interesting that in parts of the Southeast where many a person's ancestors came from Britain in the 1600s, certain expressions and words are yet used.  (What are now grammatical errors --Have you saw?--were correct in Shakespeare's time.  Perhaps this explains some of the "Southern English.")Indeed, Shakespeare is relevant and intrinsic any English speaking culture.

True musicians always study classical music, do they not?  True artists study the old masters, do they not?  Why should literari not also study the old master?

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

I taught night class a local community college, and many of the students that comprised these classes came from other cultures and backgrounds.  What is interestingg is the way they all responded to Shakespeare's works.  When we did Othello, they loved the ideas, characters, and language of the play.  They found they could relate to the situations, and they would remember lines and quotes. 

I think this is true for high school students today.  Not exposing students to Shakespeare prevents them from being exposed to a significant part of our culture, beautiful language, and situations and characters that illuminate universal conflicts.  Shakespeare's language is difficult but it is worth the effort to understand it. 

That said, there are many ways to teach Shakespeare.  Portions of plays can be studied.  Film versions can be used.  I found that lower level students enjoy Mel Gibson's Hamlet and Kenneth Branaugh's Much Ado about Nothing

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

I certainly understand what post #4 when he says the language of Shakespeare is difficult to read and understand.  I agree.  My argument is that we've gotten lazy and aren't used to having to pay close attention to what we read in order to determine meaning and appreciate the language--and that goes for some teachers as well as students.  Translations and modernizations are fine if all that matters is the story; to me, though, it's about the language and the discipline as much as the plot or characters.  Reading Shakespeare is like reading the King James version of the Bible, as both were written at roughly the same time.  It requires something from me, but it's clearly the most beautiful and poetic version.  Other versions are helpful and even necessary, at times, but there is something mature and lyrical about the KJV.  I don't advocate reading every one of Shakespeare's works; however, at the right time, reading Shakespeare is an exercise in discipline and concentration as much as lyricism and entertainment.  I say keep reading it.

 

 

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

Shakespeare is also crucial to understanding the body of Literature, especially works written in English that came after him.  To me, a lot of the reason to teach anything in school is to show students what has come before, so they can understand the foundation upon which the society we now live in was was built.  That may seem to be only a question of history class.  But it covers every subject imaginable, Literature not the least of these.

Shakespeare obviously had an effect on written works after his day, but also, we should teach Shakespeare because of the effect he had upon our language.  He invented over 1500 words that we use commonly everyday.  And for that reason alone, students should read and understand his work (and that doesn't include the phrases that we consider cliches that come from Shakespeare's plays -- phrases like:  laughing stock, sorry sight, as dead as a doornail, in a pickle and too much of a good thing).

For me, however, it is the breathtaking beauty of his poetry and the complex and intriguing development of his characters that make him a must teach in school.

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team
An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

In my mind, my response would be why not?  I guess I am not convinced of the case that would call for not teaching Shakespeare.  His dramas are filled with life lessons from which students can learn more about themselves and the world in which they live.  Works such as "King Lear" or "Othello" help to bring to light so much of what it means to experience emotions regarding other people and themselves.  At the same time, Shakespearean sonnets are excellent examples of how language can be used to re-describe individual emotions and experiences.  I think that the technical merit of teaching Shakespeare to students would be worthwhile.  We stress to students how it is important for them to "write."  Yet, we fail to show or highlight examples of how one does in fact write.  Worse things could happen in our schools if students modeled their own writing style off of Shakespeare's.

Approved by eNotes Editorial Team

We’ll help your grades soar

Start your 48-hour free trial and unlock all the summaries, Q&A, and analyses you need to get better grades now.

  • 30,000+ book summaries
  • 20% study tools discount
  • Ad-free content
  • PDF downloads
  • 300,000+ answers
  • 5-star customer support
Start your 48-Hour Free Trial