Do you find the poem "Five Ways to Kill a Man" to be realistic or pessimistic in tone?

2 Answers | Add Yours

booboosmoosh's profile pic

booboosmoosh | High School Teacher | (Level 3) Educator Emeritus

Posted on

First, I find "Five Ways to Kill a Man" a particularly powerful poem. The author provides a timeline of killing methods starting with the crucifixion of Christ through the end of the World War II.

The imagery and allusions make the poem particularly effective.

In terms of the poem's tone, I feel there is no question that the author is extremely pessimistic. Even as he describes the advancement in weaponry over many years, the sad truth is that nothing is needed to "neatly" dispose of mankind. The advancements within society, and the behavior of mankind guarantee, at least in the poet's mind, that human beings will find a way to kill themselves without any outside help.

It is sad to note that in a time when technological and medical discoveries make it possible to heal damaged bodies and fight diseases, mankind cannot work with these advancements, and must cause harm to itself and other human beings in the process.

Einstein said it best: "It has become appallingly obvious that our technology has exceeded our humanity."

jmj616's profile pic

jmj616 | Middle School Teacher | (Level 3) Associate Educator

Posted on

Thank you for ruining my evening with this poem (;.

I would have to vote for "pessimistic" regarding this poem. 

In the first four stanzas, the poem describes several ways of killing a man: crucifixion, lancing, gassing, and bombing.

To me, the stanza about bombing is especially frightening, because all it requires is the "pressing [of] one small switch."  It is so impersonal that there is no reason to believe that the bomber has any feelings of anger or hatred toward you.

The last stanza, of course, seals the pessimism:  

These are, as I began, cumbersome ways to kill a man.
Simpler, direct, and much more neat is to see
that he is living somewhere in the middle
of the twentieth century, and leave him there.

This leaves us with nowhere to escape to (except that we're now in the 21st century, which doesn't seem much better than its predecessor).  The poet is saying that the very conditions of life in the twentieth century can (and do) kill people.  Noise, pollution, overcrowding, mechanization, mass political movements, rapid communications--all of these are killers.

The poet could have mentioned some of the benefits and conveniences of modern life, but he doesn't.  That's because he is a pessimist, at least in this poem.

 

We’ve answered 318,911 questions. We can answer yours, too.

Ask a question