Segregation and the Civil Rights Movement

Start Free Trial

Do you agree with Martin Luther King Jr's view that nonviolence is the best way to fight injustice?

Expert Answers

An illustration of the letter 'A' in a speech bubbles

I think that Dr. King's ethical frame of reference is rooted in the idea that he would not allow someone else to control how he was to act.  In its most basic definition, violence as a response is ceding control to another force.  When one person uses violence, the tendency to retaliate with violence is where Dr. King argues a surrender of moral ground happens.  For Dr. King, the entire fight against injustice is a moral battle in which one should not acquiesce to a lesser form of moral standing.  It is here where Dr. King's view of nonviolence is one of ethical or moral stature.  This is one realm in which nonviolence is the best way to fight injustice, as it seeks to morally transform all participants.  It does not silence voices as much as accentuating their presence.  For Dr. King, violence for violence sake only demonstrates multiple people losing their presence of moral standing.  If individuals seek to aspire to a higher moral plane, one of transcendence and permanence in a world of contingency, Dr. King believes that individuals have embodied a standard that is ethically incorruptible.  I think that this is where Dr. King's approach can be seen as the best to injustice as it integrates more people and includes more voices as opposed to silencing them.

See eNotes Ad-Free

Start your 48-hour free trial to get access to more than 30,000 additional guides and more than 350,000 Homework Help questions answered by our experts.

Get 48 Hours Free Access
Approved by eNotes Editorial